From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3FA260BE9 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:20:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B74FE18F15 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:19:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 11CC718F0A for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:19:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id o9so6420373ejg.1 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:19:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MIdh4m2zMdtBxKttZ9NQLO9UzSksHO4qN+y3YeTmrQM=; b=lFGdn2v/vEOwwgJjqgJlBnBBKYx66Jn+zy5taFpKomSosKnfyPV6rQJhcOa+RlFjF6 rPf9jKfnmQ3nZ5XT74bavDFKvZuVK9hQOY6fcfz+lpem3FyhAY3T4lxNSu9VBfwbwKMA mY6T5Z46bR5dlyK2co3J5YJaoHRYpBnW5nHfeGBfNY5W6dL/ShfX1D8uS8ZN46FrCjlr tT8unhkiiTaLTMZGnwOWuMplV41kKLzK8KEYb91ukmBlHc/dovbm1GQzNjffr6Fr3fPe WwJLf5Ssvsyvv1x0Mz3nPLFi4F5CNxxakA3ujcezK+rt9rUjTLaLkJzA9EsFDdxSgHE7 1ikQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MIdh4m2zMdtBxKttZ9NQLO9UzSksHO4qN+y3YeTmrQM=; b=ZcCntf/dovD0i1ECbU5uyIX1xzP2Peko9aGx6IrVV7yOxeGjY+LGG+i5EcPruRXwAu NfzIXVRQvpT+sc+7Wi/bHHxaESV5UQxbDXzrhl83i47Nwvb9J9wEhzgwJQ4E5xztOu4Z 8KzD1adrHmCf5qxw7+bxPxWWWH3rJk1jawooqC4h61w+Mm2ZRJVZwCZxT0u0N+nNvJr4 nSEr+Rtkijljw3kKCr+lB0CUp9Kov4gQfZVMMOto+jOsnmKkzpuDGFBZBZjL9sw7vZMM 1e+WoGGGpz6k1HnJwFqFypXzSntlW+IXkaOpq5/gEa7siwa2wHqq7eTVjsJGcNA6cMZI SSDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5333nZi838dOdjKLuxEEEYOibkQKf0E2p3ptiJhcOgS7FG8ms5/m YPTTj5+VJ8fFdjm15RK4xKo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxeH56Ld7wgNwN0MmeWtCn47li1ByDG571LKuMLl8hY4Tw/fShW/NK1FMIb8W3I5tJe/x8wHw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4412:: with SMTP id x18mr1593578ejo.301.1606465187685; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:19:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8070:a3c0:1400:cae2:65ff:fe2e:f680? ([2a02:8070:a3c0:1400:cae2:65ff:fe2e:f680]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id oz19sm4779015ejb.28.2020.11.27.00.19.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:19:47 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> References: <4545c7f5-9b50-2f0a-952a-cc532ad01b13@gmail.com> <32d89f84-29a7-90c4-deed-1a3638c99098@proxmox.com> From: Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> Message-ID: <a56eb2e5-b4a0-e215-293d-ce730f422e4b@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:19:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <32d89f84-29a7-90c4-deed-1a3638c99098@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] [update available] Re: Caution: ceph-mon service does not start after today's updates X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:20:24 -0000 Good morning Thomas, the updated packages do the trick. I updated my ten hosts and not one needed a second reboot. Next will be the update from Nautilus to Octupus… but the instructions in the wiki are well written so I don't expect any issues there. Thanks again, Uwe Am 26.11.20 um 20:35 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: > Hi all, > Hi Uwe and Lindsay, > > ceph 14.2.15-pve2 is now available, it includes fixes for the ordering > restraints of the various ceph service unit files[0], besides that there > where zero actual code changes. > > Due to that and Stoiko's tests (much thanks for all the help!) confirming > the positive result of mine, we uploaded it for general availability. > > Thanks also to you two for reporting! > > regards, > Thomas > > [0]: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=ceph.git;a=blob;f=patches/0009-fix-service-ordering-avoid-Before-remote-fs-pre.targ.patch;h=8fe5a35c385f7d4007b4965d297fc0daa9091be3;hb=99b3812832d5d5a8ac48a2e3b084c0ecf1fd087c > >