From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 596CB9117C for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 19:32:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3C2515122 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 19:32:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 19:32:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 791854391A for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 19:32:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <a3bdec88-021c-84ca-bdb7-b16f1994bcd2@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 19:32:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:106.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/106.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> References: <20220519100820.1829147-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <20220519100820.1829147-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20220519100820.1829147-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.033 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [inventory.rs] Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/5] tape/inventory: make 'load_media_db' a method X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 17:32:32 -0000 Am 19/05/2022 um 12:08 schrieb Dominik Csapak: > and use self.inventory_path. This is only used internally (not pub) so there > is no need to have it as a static function. > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> > --- > src/tape/inventory.rs | 16 ++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > applied this one, thanks! The rest of the series would need rebasing, I skimmed it only quickly though so no in-depth review available from my side; sorry.