From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FBA68B936
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:37:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 04CA721502
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:36:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:36:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2D5B744BD9
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:36:34 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <a0b0f0a7-affe-276e-967a-eb223c1c80af@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:36:33 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.4.0
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
References: <20221025081046.93094-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221025081046.93094-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.044 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [pools.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v4 1/2] api: ceph: add applications
of each pool to the lspools endpoint
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:37:05 -0000
works well and now also hides the ceph fs pools, further reducing the chances to
build weird constellations :)
for the series:
Tested-By: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
On 10/25/22 10:10, Stefan Sterz wrote:
> since ceph luminous (ceph 12) pools need to be associated with at
> least one applicaton. expose this information here too so that clients
> of this endpoint can use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
> ---
> v3: add an api viewer entry for the applications object.
> v4: re-use the 'osd dump' command's result instead of issueing another
> command.
>
> thanks @ alwin antreich for pointing out that pools have applications!
>
> PVE/API2/Ceph/Pools.pm | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/PVE/API2/Ceph/Pools.pm b/PVE/API2/Ceph/Pools.pm
> index 6c05250e..fce56787 100644
> --- a/PVE/API2/Ceph/Pools.pm
> +++ b/PVE/API2/Ceph/Pools.pm
> @@ -125,6 +125,11 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
> title => 'Autoscale Status',
> optional => 1,
> },
> + application_metadata => {
> + type => 'object',
> + title => 'Associated Applications',
> + optional => 1,
> + },
> },
> },
> links => [ { rel => 'child', href => "{pool_name}" } ],
> @@ -162,6 +167,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
> 'pg_num',
> 'crush_rule',
> 'pg_autoscale_mode',
> + 'application_metadata',
> ];
>
> # pg_autoscaler module is not enabled in Nautilus