From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <o.bektas@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 385F881AF7 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:14:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 36322E68B for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:14:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C7340E67F for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:14:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9BB9D46A7E for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:14:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:14:23 +0100 From: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com> To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Cc: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Message-ID: <YZ+aP5gsFh0ZeeX6@gaia> Mail-Followup-To: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>, Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20211109141359.990235-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com> <20211109141359.990235-3-o.bektas@proxmox.com> <bb206ddd-92b1-4df5-e96e-0f342c411192@proxmox.com> <YZ+UaXG+K6uBhdeb@gaia> <de8cbf5b-b868-9171-e5f0-2065bb681dba@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <de8cbf5b-b868-9171-e5f0-2065bb681dba@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.754 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 2/2] set https_proxy to http_proxy for querying url metadata X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:14:25 -0000 On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:07:58PM +0100, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > On 25.11.21 14:49, Oguz Bektas wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 02:34:54PM +0100, Dominik Csapak wrote: > >> this sadly does not work, comment inline > >> > > ah thanks... i guess i forgot to restart the daemon when testing. sent a > > v2 now! > > > > So the squid access logs from the commit message are bogus? > no... the original one i had was with two lines instead of the array so it worked properly. i just forgot to restart pveproxy after changing and didnt notice.