From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7E451FF0E1 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:32:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EEE39217E7; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:31:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=2466xwb5efcvjalihhhwrxmqu4.protonmail; t=1786400751; x=1786659951; bh=d87bjqxiMLnw47UB/opcfll7gnYJ7xZmX8GfBmu71gI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=Y3sB69mxhLfmmPII+99dPCNapYV71aiRuhqpJrHmhxGNxU8Yt67MLAr2eGIQR7scH k3I3x56qIClGaKjb3jQcShxoDAMWBKD7wQf5ldHvL0bP7B9YtG0ARxTMyMnVQrKJui ueVwKqAJyQNGNEZMGPxJmt4qKFhIXXRnq3aN0WIRMJHawVJEg3IWYhrQACpZKVl+An e5nQR17TAVPnKt82o1T1Zo2WUv2QfywI/XtaIkAGhxw3dqYIGBEYPNr9PBjlXtmeYa +YEYb/5y3MNVgr10a1Pm5xZ3SUyEyUpptTn9Bl0Uu5Tnj52SuMWMFAkBgXpbOREgT4 kZB4PUO3A41ng== Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 22:25:47 +0000 To: Lund Svein-Erik From: Pheeef Subject: AW: RE: Proxmox VE stretched cluster with NetApp MetroCluster over Fibre Channel Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1795188768.63775.1785434065168.JavaMail.zextras@selund.se> References: <1795188768.63775.1785434065168.JavaMail.zextras@selund.se> Feedback-ID: 59722181:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 445aaf7736b6f7fd85033d026203dbcaa2037caf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="------10a97761e924c3096a62f45cbbe0be9d371e1fd66dacc494f72e07c0456c8e9d"; charset=utf-8 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ 0.75 Prevalent use of .info|.us|.me|.me.uk|.biz|xyz|id|rocks|life domains in spam/malware SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 2IE7CXKZVHA5CVA252XRUPP7ZUS63D6J X-Message-ID-Hash: 2IE7CXKZVHA5CVA252XRUPP7ZUS63D6J X-MailFrom: pheeef@proton.me X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 3.3.10 CC: =?utf-8?Q?Iv=C3=A1n_M=C3=A9ndez_Cair=C3=B3s?= , Proxmox VE user list X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------10a97761e924c3096a62f45cbbe0be9d371e1fd66dacc494f72e07c0456c8e9d Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary=---------------------7eb4043fa9c9330035e7724dbdcbd95c -----------------------7eb4043fa9c9330035e7724dbdcbd95c Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Hi, Svein-Erik has already done a great job going over your questions. Only on= e thing to add from my side: > 2. Is shared LVM over a multipath FC device the appropriate storage co= nfiguration for this design? If it's `what you have` it's fine. Just make sure you make your LUNs bigge= r than you have in VMware, since we can only use Thick-LVM as shared stora= ge over FC. It won't use a lot more storage since usually the SAN does ded= up, but we still need that free sapce to allocate to our snapshot chains (= which are still a tech preview - works fine though in production) Furthermore I can deeply recommend getting subscriptions for your Proxmox = VE, our experience with support has been extremly good, to the point where= we had a patch for our issue within 48 hours. (Any other vendors would be= trying to blame shift the problem onto your `non-ceritified` for at least a week /j). = ~ pheeef = -----------------------7eb4043fa9c9330035e7724dbdcbd95c-- --------10a97761e924c3096a62f45cbbe0be9d371e1fd66dacc494f72e07c0456c8e9d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail wrsEARYKAG0Fgmp6T9wJEDpgmPQiT9xxRRQAAAAAABwAIHNhbHRAbm90YXRp b25zLm9wZW5wZ3Bqcy5vcmdTRtb6wPgfseiUPRdjN4nHyBJrjXe8nZITHNGs WcQouRYhBH9zeSFeHWQ/zhekrjpgmPQiT9xxAACilQEAkffdbjtT6/o74gyZ 4PWRHIfOezLMnE8kD6RknoZEd28BAI7PuBhl5tLFY7fi/FLdj1TD7TlnW9nK hwGMd2ts7WMP =DHk0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------10a97761e924c3096a62f45cbbe0be9d371e1fd66dacc494f72e07c0456c8e9d--