From: "Shannon Sterz" <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
To: "Mark Atwood" <mark@wolfssl.com>, <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH common 1/2] ticket: accept RSA tickets signed with SHA-256
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 15:07:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMKS7YDS2YS7.11BF4DKI67SG1@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023185749.509347-1-mark@wolfssl.com>
On Fri Oct 23, 2026 at 8:57 PM CEST, Mark Atwood wrote:
> Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA signs and verifies with SHA-1 unless told otherwise,
> so all RSA tickets (login, TFA, VNC, tunnel) are RSA PKCS#1 v1.5
> signatures over SHA-1. NIST SP 800-131A Rev. 2 no longer allows SHA-1 for
> creating digital signatures. FIPS providers for OpenSSL 3 can enforce
> this, for example wolfProvider, or the OpenSSL FIPS provider with its
> signature digest check enabled. With such a provider no ticket can be
> issued and nobody can log in.
>
> As a first step, make verification accept tickets signed with SHA-256 in
> addition to SHA-1. Once all nodes of a cluster run a version with this
> change, the signing side can switch to SHA-256 without locking users out
> of nodes that were not yet upgraded.
>
> The hash is set explicitly before each attempt, since callers cache and
> reuse the key object. A provider that does not allow SHA-1 raises an
> error from verify() instead of returning false, so the call is wrapped
> in eval and such a ticket is treated like any other invalid ticket.
>
> Add a test that signs tickets directly with Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA using
> either hash, and checks that they are accepted and that modified,
> expired, foreign-key or wrong-secret tickets are rejected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Atwood <mark@wolfssl.com>
> ---
> src/PVE/Ticket.pm | 15 +++++++++-
> test/Makefile | 1 +
> test/ticket_test.pl | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100755 test/ticket_test.pl
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/Ticket.pm b/src/PVE/Ticket.pm
> index 764c02d..f700f39 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/Ticket.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/Ticket.pm
> @@ -79,8 +79,21 @@ sub verify_rsa_ticket {
> my $sig = $2;
>
> my $full = defined($secret_data) ? "$plain:$secret_data" : $plain;
> + my $raw_sig = decode_base64($sig);
> +
> + # Older versions sign with SHA-1, so during a rolling upgrade a cluster has tickets
> + # with either hash. A provider that refuses SHA-1 raises an error rather than
> + # returning false, which simply makes such a ticket invalid.
nit: This could probably benefit from comment like:
# TODO: Remove SHA-1 fallback once SHA-256 signed tickets are the
# default across PMG and PVE for at least one major release.
> + my $valid;
> + for my $use_hash ('use_sha256_hash', 'use_sha1_hash') {
> + $valid = eval {
> + $rsa_pub->$use_hash();
> + $rsa_pub->verify($full, $raw_sig);
It might be worth to add documentation that the state of the RSA pub key
object may be modified depending on what ticket is being verified. If a
SHA-256 ticket is verified, other users of `$rsa_pub` will now use
SHA-256 for verifying signatures in other contexts; if the ticket is
SHA-1, then SHA-1 will be used.
This can make it hard to tell from a caller's perspective in what state
the object will be after a call to this function. IMO, this should at
least be documented or maybe we should reset the object after the last
`verify()` call unconditionally. What do you think?
Note: From a quick check, none of the users should have a reason to call
`verify()` outside of the functions in `PVE::Ticket`. Here you always
correctly set the hash function before using the object, so it shouldn't
be an issue in practice.
> + };
The eval call also swallows *all* errors that could happen during
verification, might be worth checking what `$@` contains and warning
about it.
> + last if $valid;
> + }
>
> - if ($rsa_pub->verify($full, decode_base64($sig))) {
> + if ($valid) {
> if ($plain =~ m/^\Q$prefix\E:(?:(\S+):)?([A-Z0-9]{8})$/) {
> my $data = $1; # Note: not all tickets contains data
> my $timestamp = $2;
> diff --git a/test/Makefile b/test/Makefile
> index 1bce185..7eac9ea 100644
> --- a/test/Makefile
> +++ b/test/Makefile
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ TESTS = lock_file.test \
> section_config_property_isolation_test.test \
> file-test.test \
> cmd-test.test \
> + ticket_test.test \
>
> all:
>
> diff --git a/test/ticket_test.pl b/test/ticket_test.pl
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..37e30b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/test/ticket_test.pl
> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> +#!/usr/bin/perl
> +
> +# Tests for signing and verifying RSA tickets with PVE::Ticket
> +
> +use v5.36;
> +
> +use lib '../src';
> +
> +use Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA;
> +use MIME::Base64;
> +use Test::More;
> +
> +use PVE::Ticket;
> +
> +my $rsa_priv = Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA->generate_key(2048);
> +my $rsa_pub = Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA->new_public_key($rsa_priv->get_public_key_string());
> +
> +# sign like a node would, with an explicitly chosen hash, independent of PVE::Ticket
> +sub sign_ticket($priv, $hash, $plain, $secret_data = undef) {
> + my $full = defined($secret_data) ? "$plain:$secret_data" : $plain;
> + my $use_hash = "use_${hash}_hash";
> + $priv->$use_hash();
> + return $plain . "::" . encode_base64($priv->sign($full), '');
> +}
> +
> +my $now = sprintf("%08X", time());
> +my $old = sprintf("%08X", time() - 7200);
> +
> +for my $hash (qw(sha256 sha1)) {
> + my $ticket = sign_ticket($rsa_priv, $hash, "PVE:root\@pam:$now");
> + my ($data, $age) = PVE::Ticket::verify_rsa_ticket($rsa_pub, 'PVE', $ticket, undef, -1, 60, 1);
> + is($data, 'root@pam', "$hash signed ticket is accepted");
> + ok(defined($age) && $age >= 0 && $age < 60, "$hash signed ticket has plausible age");
> +
> + $ticket = sign_ticket($rsa_priv, $hash, "PVEVNC:$now", 'vnc-secret');
> + ok(
> + PVE::Ticket::verify_rsa_ticket($rsa_pub, 'PVEVNC', $ticket, 'vnc-secret', -20, 40, 1),
> + "$hash signed ticket with secret data is accepted",
> + );
> + ok(
> + !PVE::Ticket::verify_rsa_ticket($rsa_pub, 'PVEVNC', $ticket, 'other', -20, 40, 1),
> + "$hash signed ticket with wrong secret data is rejected",
> + );
> +
> + $ticket = sign_ticket($rsa_priv, $hash, "PVE:root\@pam:$now");
> + (my $tampered = $ticket) =~ s/^PVE:root\@pam:/PVE:admin\@pam:/;
> + ok(
> + !PVE::Ticket::verify_rsa_ticket($rsa_pub, 'PVE', $tampered, undef, -1, 60, 1),
> + "$hash signed ticket with modified data is rejected",
> + );
> + eval { PVE::Ticket::verify_rsa_ticket($rsa_pub, 'PVE', $tampered, undef, -1, 60) };
> + like($@, qr/invalid PVE ticket/, "$hash signed modified ticket raises error without noerr");
nit: Would benefit from a test case that checks whether verification
succeeds without `$noerr` set too.
> +
> + $ticket = sign_ticket($rsa_priv, $hash, "PVE:root\@pam:$old");
> + ok(
> + !PVE::Ticket::verify_rsa_ticket($rsa_pub, 'PVE', $ticket, undef, -1, 60, 1),
> + "$hash signed expired ticket is rejected",
> + );
> +
> + my $other_priv = Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA->generate_key(2048);
> + $ticket = sign_ticket($other_priv, $hash, "PVE:root\@pam:$now");
> + ok(
> + !PVE::Ticket::verify_rsa_ticket($rsa_pub, 'PVE', $ticket, undef, -1, 60, 1),
> + "$hash signed ticket from another key is rejected",
> + );
> +}
> +
> +done_testing();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 18:36 [PATCH common 0/2] ticket: sign RSA tickets with SHA-256 Mark Atwood
2026-10-23 18:57 ` [PATCH common 1/2] ticket: accept RSA tickets signed " Mark Atwood
2026-11-02 14:07 ` Shannon Sterz [this message]
2026-10-23 18:57 ` [PATCH common 2/2] ticket: sign RSA tickets " Mark Atwood
2026-11-02 14:07 ` Shannon Sterz
2026-11-02 14:07 ` [PATCH common 0/2] " Shannon Sterz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMKS7YDS2YS7.11BF4DKI67SG1@proxmox.com \
--to=s.sterz@proxmox.com \
--cc=mark@wolfssl.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.