From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 572521FF09B for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:16:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 259492139F; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:16:51 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:16:47 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Lukas Wagner" To: "Thomas Ellmenreich" , Subject: Re: [PATCH proxmox 4/6] log: add tests to the logger X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2-dirty References: <20261007074527.102419-1-t.ellmenreich@proxmox.com> <20261007074527.102419-5-t.ellmenreich@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20261007074527.102419-5-t.ellmenreich@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1791807407885 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.310 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: GD2MNX5P2OLT3GX5I3UTMAY6W5PWBNDB X-Message-ID-Hash: GD2MNX5P2OLT3GX5I3UTMAY6W5PWBNDB X-MailFrom: l.wagner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed Oct 7, 2026 at 9:45 AM CEST, Thomas Ellmenreich wrote: > Add tests to ensure consistent functionality when setting the logging > environment variable, as well as global filtering of logs. > > Although the EnvFilter itself is not something we should be testing, we a= re > adding some additional machinery, on top of the extensive functionality > provided by tracing/tracing_subscriber, which does need testing. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Ellmenreich Reviewed-by: Lukas Wagner