From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 225B91FF0AF for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:26:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0BFF72165A; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:26:46 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:26:41 +0200 Message-Id: To: "Joaquin Varela" From: "Max R. Carrara" Subject: Re: [RFC] Native ZFS over NVMe/TCP storage backend for Proxmox VE X-Mailer: aerc 0.18.2-0-ge037c095a049 References: In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1790242001259 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.362 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 23Z27FYY3HD54BL3MNIIMAUHDMVFDGUC X-Message-ID-Hash: 23Z27FYY3HD54BL3MNIIMAUHDMVFDGUC X-MailFrom: m.carrara@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Joaquin! Sorry for taking so long -- I'm finally getting around to reviewing your patch series. Expect a review on the mailing list either this week (if I'm really quick) or next week. Sorry again, and thanks for being so patient! Had a lot of things in my backlog to sort out. Have a good one, Max On Thu Sep 24, 2026 at 5:53 AM CEST, Joaquin Varela wrote: > Hi Max, > > I wanted to follow up on the zfsnvme v2 series sent on August 2. We are > interested in deploying this type of shared ZFS over NVMe/TCP storage in > production, so feedback on the design and any blockers you see for upstre= am > integration would be especially valuable before we make that decision. > > Have you had a chance to look at the series, or is it still waiting in th= e > review queue? If a full review will take longer, even a brief indication = of > architectural concerns or the likely next step would help us plan. > > I know review time is limited, and I appreciate your help. > > Kind regards, > Joaquin Varela > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 11:45=E2=80=AFAM Joaquin Varela > wrote: > > > Hi Max, > > > > Just a gentle follow-up on the zfsnvme v2 patch series I sent on > > August 2. I understand you have a review backlog, and I appreciate > > your time. > > > > Please let me know if there is any additional information about the > > design or test setup that would help with the review, or if you would > > prefer any changes to the way the series is organized. > > > > For convenience, here are the three series: > > > > pve-storage: > > > > https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/cover.1785636979.git.joaquinvarela@n= eatech.ar/T/ > > > > pve-manager: > > > > https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/cover.1785636980.git.joaquinvarela@n= eatech.ar/T/ > > > > pve-docs: > > > > https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/cover.1785636981.git.joaquinvarela@n= eatech.ar/T/ > > > > Thank you again for your time and interest. > > > > Kind regards, > > Joaquin Varela > >