From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A18A1FF0AA for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2026 13:44:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DDB91215C3; Mon, 07 Sep 2026 13:44:48 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 13:44:43 +0200 Message-Id: To: "Robert Obkircher" , From: "Max R. Carrara" Subject: Re: [PATCH proxmox{,-backup} v2 00/10] Fix Undefined Behavior in Tape Block Header Deallocation X-Mailer: aerc 0.18.2-0-ge037c095a049 References: <20260821140238.615302-1-m.carrara@proxmox.com> <7e4e555a-c52b-4378-8290-ea18aef7c97f@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <7e4e555a-c52b-4378-8290-ea18aef7c97f@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1788781476973 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.609 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: MMBCD7AUXU45P47PE2TUSKLLRK5XLTMV X-Message-ID-Hash: MMBCD7AUXU45P47PE2TUSKLLRK5XLTMV X-MailFrom: m.carrara@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed Sep 2, 2026 at 6:36 PM CEST, Robert Obkircher wrote: > Oops, the replies to the proxmox-backup patches were sent to earlier > ones, because I skipped over the two proxmox patches when I applied > them for b4 review tui. Yeah I noticed that, but that's alright, thanks for the review regardless; appreciate it! :) > > On 21.08.26 16:02, Max R. Carrara wrote: > > Fix Undefined Behavior in Tape Block Header Deallocation - v2 > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > [..] > >