From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F1271FF0F1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 10:06:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8358921346; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 10:06:24 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 10:06:19 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH datacenter-manager 13/15] task cache: trigger repair of corruption when compressing archive files From: "Lukas Wagner" To: "Dominik Csapak" , "Lukas Wagner" , X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2-dirty References: <20260702092258.174740-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <20260702092258.174740-14-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <6cff14e4-0b10-493f-b8c5-a8f6199e5f74@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <6cff14e4-0b10-493f-b8c5-a8f6199e5f74@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1783929964597 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.344 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: U4UCWR7V54WS4LONRAY7WST6SEBW4SSQ X-Message-ID-Hash: U4UCWR7V54WS4LONRAY7WST6SEBW4SSQ X-MailFrom: l.wagner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri Jul 10, 2026 at 1:36 PM CEST, Dominik Csapak wrote: > if i'm reading this right, this not only triggers the repair, > but changes the compression from one implemenation to the one in > the archivefilewriter? > > if yes, we should either mention it in the commit, or > split that out into a separate one I'll be sure to include the rationale in the commit message! Thanks!