From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 722851FF142
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 05 Jun 2026 16:26:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EFD611BDC8;
	Fri,  5 Jun 2026 16:26:42 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 16:26:38 +0200
Message-Id: <DJ16OWI5TDRQ.K6IDKMBUR3F8@proxmox.com>
From: "Lukas Sichert" <l.sichert@proxmox.com>
To: "Jakob Klocker" <j.klocker@proxmox.com>, <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH container] fix: #7148: check CT protection before
 reassigning volume
References: <20260601115240.36497-1-j.klocker@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20260601115240.36497-1-j.klocker@proxmox.com>
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1780669558970
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.293 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: Z37XYWF45UZEV6WTDNBASMKJYCBDKLRZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: Z37XYWF45UZEV6WTDNBASMKJYCBDKLRZ
X-MailFrom: l.sichert@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

I was able to reproduce the Problem, the Patch worked for me.

One thing I found, which is only indirectly related:
One can't move storage to a protected container, but one can move
storage from a protected container to an unprotected container, which to
my intuition seems wrong.
Is this expected behaviour?

Tested-by: Lukas Sichert <l.sichert@proxmox.com>

On 2026-06-01 13:52, Jakob Klocker <j.klocker@proxmox.com> wrote:

> When reassigning a volume, check the destination config before
> removing the volume from the source config.
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D7148
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Klocker <j.klocker@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm b/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
> index 88067dd..af01de0 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
> @@ -2791,6 +2791,8 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>                      if !PVE::Storage::storage_can_replicate($storecfg, $=
storeid, $format);
>              }
> =20
> +            PVE::LXC::Config->check_protection($target_conf, "can't move=
 volume '$target_mpkey' to CT $target_vmid");
> +
>              return ($source_conf, $target_conf, $drive);
>          };
> =20
> --=20
> 2.47.3