From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE4D1FF133 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:07:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8DBAB2502B; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:07:13 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:07:06 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: superseded: [PATCH cluster/docs/manager v2 0/8] add warning messages for high token timeouts in clusters From: =?utf-8?q?Michael_K=C3=B6ppl?= To: =?utf-8?q?Michael_K=C3=B6ppl?= , Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0 References: <20260420164314.370023-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20260420164314.370023-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1777309531450 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.095 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: MO742YQLOJNUIMOAYS73QCT5T36NPYQH X-Message-ID-Hash: MO742YQLOJNUIMOAYS73QCT5T36NPYQH X-MailFrom: m.koeppl@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Superseded-by: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20260427170548.307698-1-m.koeppl@proxmox= .com On Mon Apr 20, 2026 at 6:43 PM CEST, Michael K=C3=B6ppl wrote: > This patch series introduces warnings informing users about high token > timeouts in their clusters. A recent change [0] lowered the token > coefficient for clusters and allowed adapting it. However, this change > only affects new clusters. As described in [1], users with existing > cluster should be informed about the high token timeouts in their > configurations and what they can do to alleviate this problem. [snip]