From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3EB01FF13E for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:25:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AB3521B5DC; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:25:16 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:25:11 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH proxmox/yew-pwt/datacenter-manager/installer v3 00/38] add auto-installer integration From: "Lukas Wagner" To: "Dominik Csapak" , "Christoph Heiss" , X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2-dirty References: <20260403165437.2166551-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> <8079685a-be9c-4e28-954c-bd1debe7ce7d@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1776417831377 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.097 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment POISEN_SPAM_PILL 0.1 Meta: its spam POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: II5E455KQHKQIBVXYYGDKICIXF3DTIYU X-Message-ID-Hash: II5E455KQHKQIBVXYYGDKICIXF3DTIYU X-MailFrom: l.wagner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri Apr 17, 2026 at 11:10 AM CEST, Dominik Csapak wrote: > also two things i forgot: > > i think we could make the endpoint available without authentication? > at least that's what i would have expected, since the current > http endpoints also had to be public? > > second things is about the tokens + acl, I'd probably > use the existing token acl mechanism, so instead of > having custom tokens + a token list per answer, > > use the standard pdm tokens + an acl path (e.g.=20 > /system/auto-installation/answers/ ) maybe a separate privilege > could make sense here, so the token does not have access > to anything else? > Check out my response to v2, which is (I think) the main reason why it is implemented like it is right now: https://lore.proxmox.com/all/DETMUXY1Q877.32G593TWC52WW@proxmox.com/T/#u