From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC89F1FF136 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:04:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 11D8318878; Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:05:03 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:04:27 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH ha-manager v2 3/4] fix #2751: implement disarm-ha and arm-ha for safe cluster maintenance From: "Dominik Rusovac" To: "Thomas Lamprecht" , Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.0 References: <20260321234350.2158438-1-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> <20260321234350.2158438-4-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20260321234350.2158438-4-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1774271021272 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.352 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: CCTUD3CDRKIDYBO6AEX2WXRG5CRDSUOA X-Message-ID-Hash: CCTUD3CDRKIDYBO6AEX2WXRG5CRDSUOA X-MailFrom: d.rusovac@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: two negligible nits inline On Sun Mar 22, 2026 at 12:42 AM CET, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: [snip] > diff --git a/src/PVE/HA/Sim/Hardware.pm b/src/PVE/HA/Sim/Hardware.pm > index 301c391..f6857bd 100644 > --- a/src/PVE/HA/Sim/Hardware.pm > +++ b/src/PVE/HA/Sim/Hardware.pm > @@ -835,6 +835,15 @@ sub sim_hardware_cmd { > || $action eq 'disable-node-maintenance' > ) { > $self->queue_crm_commands_nolock("$action $node"); > + } elsif ($action eq 'disarm-ha') { > + my $mode =3D $params[0]; > + > + die "sim_hardware_cmd: unknown resource mode '$mode'\n" > + if $mode !~ m/^(freeze|ignore)$/; > + > + $self->queue_crm_commands_nolock("disarm-ha $mode"); $self->queue_crm_commands_nolock("$action $mode"); nit: following DRY principle, this would be cleaner imo > + } elsif ($action eq 'arm-ha') { > + $self->queue_crm_commands_nolock("arm-ha"); $self->queue_crm_commands_nolock("$action"); nit: same here [snip]