From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C92F21FF183 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:09:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 37332223E9; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:10:13 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:09:40 +0100 Message-Id: From: "Lukas Wagner" To: "Christoph Heiss" , "Lukas Wagner" , "Thomas Lamprecht" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2-dirty References: <20251205112528.373387-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> <20251205112528.373387-13-c.heiss@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1765962570792 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.033 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v2 12/14] ui: auto-installer: add installations overview panel X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Cc: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" On Tue Dec 16, 2025 at 2:55 PM CET, Christoph Heiss wrote: > On Tue Dec 9, 2025 at 1:35 PM CET, Lukas Wagner wrote: > [..] >>> diff --git a/ui/src/main_menu.rs b/ui/src/main_menu.rs >>> index 18988ea..073b84d 100644 >>> --- a/ui/src/main_menu.rs >>> +++ b/ui/src/main_menu.rs >>> @@ -378,6 +379,18 @@ impl Component for PdmMainMenu { >>> remote_submenu, >>> ); >>> >>> + let mut autoinstaller_submenu = Menu::new(); >>> + >>> + register_submenu( >>> + &mut menu, >>> + &mut content, >>> + tr!("Automated Installations"), >>> + "auto-installer", >>> + Some("fa fa-cubes"), >>> + |_| AutoInstallerPanel::default().into(), >>> + autoinstaller_submenu, >>> + ); >> >> I'm not sure whether this should be a top-level menu - but then again, >> I'm not sure where it could go else. Maybe a tab under "Remotes"? Since >> any node that was automatically would realistically be added as a remote >> at some later time? > > Yeah, bit hard. Given its two panels, not sure if we want to cram it > under Remotes somewhere. How could these two panels then be sensible > structured to not have two tabs (which would be kinda weird)? @Thomas, do you have any input on how/where the auto installer feature could be integrated in the UI? I think it could be quite an important feature of PDM, but then again I don't want to 'pollute' the root-level of the sidebar menu too much. _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel