From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7072D1FF15C for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 17:07:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D8C9B1A179; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 17:07:22 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 17:06:48 +0200 Message-Id: From: =?utf-8?q?Michael_K=C3=B6ppl?= To: "Proxmox VE development discussion" Cc: "pve-devel" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1 References: <20250919140620.243497-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1758294399124 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.034 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager/manager/proxmox-widget-toolkit 0/3] remove X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Fri Sep 19, 2025 at 4:41 PM CEST, Daniel Kral wrote: > Just to link these here, there were two community forum posts [0] and > [1], which added some more viewpoints how HA groups are/were used and > what could still be improved for the HA rules. > > The pain points were primarily that users could add/remove HA resources > to/from HA groups directly through the VM/CT in the web interface under > More > Manage HA and then select the assigned HA group there, instead of > going to the Datacenter > HA tab. > > For HA node affinity rules, the former isn't possible anymore and the > main workflow is to add the HA resources and then add them to a node > affinity rule in bulk there. I'm not sure how we could improve that yet. > > [0] https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/172190/ [1] https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/171427/ _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel