From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FDF11FF186 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 11:17:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7C83728E1E; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 11:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 11:17:09 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Lukas Wagner" To: "Stefan Hanreich" , "Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion" , "Dominik Csapak" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1-0-g2ecb8770224a References: <20250828144247.298536-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <20250828144247.298536-2-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <5fca5c4c-cdbb-4cbf-b3a0-475f2d7f1f44@proxmox.com> <3a380a6a-724a-46ac-a6ef-b15bfbbb7257@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <3a380a6a-724a-46ac-a6ef-b15bfbbb7257@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1756459021586 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.027 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [RFC proxmox-datacenter-manager 1/2] server: add convenience helper to fetch results from many remote nodes in parallel X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" On Fri Aug 29, 2025 at 11:02 AM CEST, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > On 8/29/25 10:58 AM, Dominik Csapak wrote: > > [snip] > >> probably a `fn do_for_all_remotes` that only does one thing per remote >> would also be nice? (i think stefan said he'll need something like this) > > currently working on implementing this - I'll send a patch soon hopefully yup, unfortunately this was a misunderstanding between me and Stefan; I thought that the also needed the 'for all nodes' function that was implemented here; but anyways, this should be pretty easy to add now as well. _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel