From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 013831FF17C for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 11:59:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 815CD37F02; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 12:00:51 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 12:00:48 +0200 Message-Id: To: "Thomas Lamprecht" , "Proxmox Backup Server development discussion" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.0 References: <20250806084246.51599-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> <9805fd34-5ecc-4fb3-b451-817da46f3c60@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <9805fd34-5ecc-4fb3-b451-817da46f3c60@proxmox.com> From: "Shannon Sterz" X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1754474427817 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.023 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] cargo: require proxmox-auth-api 1.0.3 X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" On Wed Aug 6, 2025 at 11:56 AM CEST, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 06.08.25 um 10:43 schrieb Shannon Sterz: >> the only change is that we log the appropriate error return code on >> failed login attempts. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shannon Sterz >> --- >> >> would be nice to have that in there, as we seem to have a hard to >> reproduce pam issue going on and that might give us some more >> information. > > Latest PBS I uploaded is already build with that package though, so > this is just to ensure others build it also with this version, or? ah sorry than this was a misunderstanding on my side, yep can be ignored. sorry for the noise _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel