From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A4631FF185 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:19:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0D0E51EBF5; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:20:37 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 13:20:33 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Lukas Wagner" To: "Proxmox VE development discussion" , "Shannon Sterz" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1-0-g2ecb8770224a References: <20250804105024.117020-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20250804105024.117020-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1754306415343 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] fix #6599: ui: use font-awesome instead of png icons X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Mon Aug 4, 2025 at 12:50 PM CEST, Shannon Sterz wrote: > previously we used custom png rendered icons for guests and storages > in the add menu of a pool, as well as for mountpoints for containers. > these appeared blurry on high resolution displays and since they were > just the same as the font-awesome icons anyway, use those directly. > the ui already loads font-awesome regardless, so there are no > down-sides here. > LGTM! Reviewed-by: Lukas Wagner Verified that these three icons are indeed replaced with the high-resolution version from FA: Tested-by: Lukas Wagner _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel