From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <brwainer@gmail.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D3B6B523
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:41:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CAFE019EF8
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:41:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 31E1C19EE1
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:41:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id lt17so9500852ejb.3
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:41:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=8BFIsvaDyNo3NpL57doOGox0Q5sLy7Goa/J4SHPOlXQ=;
 b=GYa0TeJvi/J/6du+nDLr7DdTDJmiPSiM1/YlzscoILAdS3FIqW0D037EXtyIcajfRY
 0jrcJ7xoGh4qgwVvumLiYziLBj+SEp6XEQQ0OIQSbPKQmXxyeh/qpufLLgXyESmBuy65
 mu2yQQ3b5iyoLd27cKtqEJFpyg+zPMEyyhM/aj1n2zlfdMVbjNNAu1CDRs4h4ZjtlSDT
 iCVcXjuavlogo+5XU26hg29C31g2VFdixg4E/VwDKH/QNzU4RTmIRpGr0OoDIF8ozwb5
 XXM07adlQNpjCANqo1H8WukgQScDfJ0oocmVEEuEU/0kHyewzo8zT6Ktg3geK06nbcf+
 NIew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=8BFIsvaDyNo3NpL57doOGox0Q5sLy7Goa/J4SHPOlXQ=;
 b=et3etsQjOQGEPsVNgIUdoDX/5rGylqZSRWT7nYDYCOdze57o4KmQekUKD3CBB8hqEE
 LmejzRJhzWKglBVgf9PeaCOnLfx9dJ8YKQPQXOi20TOCOjjLLbX8MFtakD/RjSMOl8aZ
 07pvBlF0epnxZtaFJKRiISTXfWgHfu52vb+2GfxU27W96bMMr/us8jmux/dAl1228qxm
 csNphZiq/6SrVxX9ZF+39iWjMOetpHOhZ6rB92/HBOBdgMPT13uWRXjmePyI9e3DmXmK
 47sM/G3cbwkqhRBJYmPFp2AUs/biTt7acUpntRwbY2F11ngGAvG9eF13EhZ8RabN5/RA
 IJAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530EhFfgvt9Lkhl8BNM1hqAbAV3msvD+fiIEDDrziyFg5CGsyaXp
 bg9FybQmJTWnkbYr/jBqR792Peq9/5vXwkNL1WjtemI26dRZOVJ+
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztThzmorAFPkHCtpSUGseOEjQh5qtjSSa/hzLmC7Scth6OxvuXEiPyeHqpvn7By8d7dJoRHFZyjRAhMnv1xIo=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1b46:: with SMTP id
 p6mr8384398ejg.68.1607636480426; 
 Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:41:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPEXuiwNr3OjBh9ArMiBToVAD6EXf5Rp+Ph7OswvAkmFWPmUwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <dba3eab5-6b50-a235-8f62-c07c0827f45c@odiso.com>
In-Reply-To: <dba3eab5-6b50-a235-8f62-c07c0827f45c@odiso.com>
From: Bruce Wainer <brwainer@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:41:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPEXuizOTE-D20ijT_shrxZkiYt89UF-+OFK-RzWvefhb_J0Gw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.215 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
 FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 HTML_MESSAGE            0.001 HTML included in message
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [pve-manager] sdn: Adding phpIPAM as IPAM provider
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:41:28 -0000

Great thanks, I thought I had seen it in one of the patches but when I
looked back at some of the more recent submissions it looked like only the
internal IPAM was being implemented at first.
Bruce

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 3:33 AM alexandre derumier <aderumier@odiso.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
> phpIPAM is already implemented :)
>
> (currently phpIPAM && netbox)
>
> On 09/12/2020 20:01, Bruce Wainer wrote:
> >   Hello,
> > In your new SDN environment, are there plans for a plugin for phpIPAM? If
> > not, can you provide any starting points for developing one?
> > Thank you,
> > Bruce Wainer
> > _______________________________________________
> > pve-devel mailing list
> > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
>