From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <rutger.verhoeven@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FA1F625EE for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:49:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6853A2780B for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:49:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com (mail-io1-xd2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6CD2E277F4 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:49:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id g7so9408774iov.13 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:49:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8yL4IDeGoatKmCY2oceEURXctnMrZMNwIiTQv7442Zs=; b=J33Gsqnx/R8CDAwM1qFoytWaXA1yDDKpyXUhu4+b7YLIKT0RSaDNsoKJfoB9yT9D46 5Qtqm9FxsA1+GEGcgMPeuyglou6VhFx0dXNCZz0ByUG+o+Tc+xXv4rMkoVFXFnDdeQyv cBIwXaSAG4KfmQHAoUvm2YmzylXPV4Pj20+QWHSVvJC686LCPLZb4WQhbhziZXdmWPUQ niYhqsZRoQIWaFVcfpnbIY4EmEdgh3NHH2W4gOHbSFm2vMGgo6dWRDsiBpfC+I7jSkNk 5DDOmnVRTZLjq42U1bGX9sj9VRC01QvyKpCOKIUQmGwhPJpeT8r4iRf+1BDNSWEbKKvV UQew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=8yL4IDeGoatKmCY2oceEURXctnMrZMNwIiTQv7442Zs=; b=h/SGfbf6+Bk0PtPxkdEYNFSAPRFLPlDsiImPTMM09VCX/RobxK3mhCUZynWvvRmTE/ 197iGAbSjz5fDh5pbvxOc/PDJyZWF9fzSDGafzJmcdXuawp3vKjPOGfcsINzupX32MJg SmzWoQQ+UTW2B0Vr6lDU3I/XrU5JFLLn4z5ZbS6dHBKcT2sTCuR/qAoqPtR0Bi7uaUfv bKHY9da72QVzpPUtt0Ws7O+kBOSfK2QlqFGjecYlAPnYLRvx0Hu8xtOPLwWURDzVfOa7 uFhAwYR/fLZsBjvh1XFeKyhQMOW6YJMFjt0gQfCrlcVnK14QNIVASukrB810hqmBeGbb S7ug== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KTEIPU6w7CWRsgyQ00y/EqITkL97mGj0Kc1alhVStTu/douDW K+0s1Uk7hntnp53DHDfL8Xs8uref/rrzjLrKZob0rFf9KHM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyE4OfF5FPgtL5d4z9VI49o0/AL2WEkoe0GYL123gxLFSm8fT62IjzLdl7Y0EcQC1rs8226pu23HdRWpLu7Z78= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:a705:: with SMTP id b5mr16227431iod.73.1600282142764; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:49:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <mailman.347.1598805038.464.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> <CACPKT4VHi+s9-O+Mhyzi3_OgcgyFC0S8YqMouTJHOm4+i4aCAA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CACPKT4VHi+s9-O+Mhyzi3_OgcgyFC0S8YqMouTJHOm4+i4aCAA@mail.gmail.com> From: Rutger Verhoeven <rutger.verhoeven@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:48:51 +0200 Message-ID: <CAOekgU43RYfAproJKr23UZmr6ioHS5Yi40VHU769JLDjEQ0LmA@mail.gmail.com> To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.300 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] 2 node cluster X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:49:42 -0000 Thnx for this explanation! On Tue, Sep 15, 2020, 12:51 Ivan Dimitrov <hipantcii@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It is possible but not recommended ;) > Option 1 is to use a Raspberry Pi or something similar to create a 3-rd > node in the cluster. > Option 2 I have the same setup and requirements as you so here is what I am > doing - assign the "master" node 2 votes and expect a total of 3. In this > case you always have quorum. > You can do this by: > - follow the guidelines in ProxMox wiki how to edit the corosync > configuration (stop the services, etc.) > - edit the configuration > - bump the configuration version > - restart the services > > Of course this is not supported and you should be careful with the VM ids > on both nodes but for homelab it works perfectly. > > With Best Regards, > Ivan Dimitrov > > > On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 18:30, tinfoil-hat via pve-user < > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: tinfoil-hat <list-sub@tinfoil-hat.net> > > To: pve-user@pve.proxmox.com > > Cc: > > Bcc: > > Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:24:58 +0200 > > Subject: 2 node cluster > > Hi Folks, > > > > I wanted to ask if it's possible and a proper solution to create a 2 node > > cluster with one noede powered off and just use as fallback when the > other > > node needs maintainance. It's just a small home environment, but I plan > to > > deploy a pfsense solution and a local dns / dhcp ldap and monitoring. So > I > > wouldn't be able to access the Internet when I need to maintain the main > > host. So I tought, I cramp up an old desktop pc which will serve as > > fallback, that gets powered on, when I need to migrate my virtualised > > infrastructure. I am open to alternative suggestions. I would like to do > it > > to teach myself in compsci, and I figured the best way was to adopt my > > homenetwork. I don't have other persons relying on the network, so I > would > > just need to eat my own brewn soup. > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: tinfoil-hat via pve-user <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> > > To: pve-user@pve.proxmox.com > > Cc: tinfoil-hat <list-sub@tinfoil-hat.net> > > Bcc: > > Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:24:58 +0200 > > Subject: [PVE-User] 2 node cluster > > _______________________________________________ > > pve-user mailing list > > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > >