From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3388C68F75 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 14:08:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2352423C34 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 14:08:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B1AC723C1F for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 14:08:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id t68so4069118qkf.8 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 05:08:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aau5GHgsq14lcTf3xygWExLH5VYO6GnIBEbbgsVp3ks=; b=hj4JyCpeehPmZn1iZq0VWrtDMQ5r31AGzS+PEskwhUJ0UR6akRziism9DyOGektFA6 spipcxJui0hHnb3LmE7dgZP9IHi7O2BtmE8D39pmGmEBuimcEgFCrHlSJwBdWHTtnPFZ 7eATpf8h2SPBaE7o3ZcIEqv3iQ+QG0s1caOqL1dWNouwW1XndE+6/w4dw6ii4p6G+yDB 9eKMZvXy22ksESSSpt1+RLXcCzXV09rztFP5MKS68EChWRpL2sczkLaFdjGkUHYkeRR1 OgUcO60JEEv6jm0VZbv6AGiXZb7QGy1PrK46Jt1iw8da7BlVzr32mdz4Lm9NPV2/iAYQ a71A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=aau5GHgsq14lcTf3xygWExLH5VYO6GnIBEbbgsVp3ks=; b=ls4RXKbi7zrWW1IXUSL41Ohap0QVw4yL04125TLK5oULAoNuZSfr2//Z23TczNxeuI Huw+uAPBmLO+ViCK6iLgOq7uLQ5I6FQflKgwGeuOWuPLoYzPCCSfFVifzwDkQlOI+/CC m5L0FuZfJ+0VEIGhSdUqyy+oO8MnwNklr4xXPXBsLEsbRsRp7YoGP2vWcqHcF63Xx03p 2n63aJOiR5WkYtvVldtRWyyddS9H4LNa6A3VKYOgba72rwjgOwWO1l4RXyMjE9+Xj9f4 IlFosJ7eIeFrTrJ8L3uOXtSDS/jAEQwlP1CFaT51102ia95g8TXQOuziB4OcY++dpYED HD+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320fFxfnexlr5ycNkdqzUlgh/WNvcIJFGfqAc0Dwn3TnIr0xDfY fxwNuX7TETffUzyUQiX7mUuSbW1NhzYMUpN1IWWxzteK X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfz0wjFopCk4vPS0PFUWmloz4OZgPOMv2kqDHDNIQQEbZgtRa7rb5d66NZ5De0uXXQ/j8rQf7klLVr9Pskbg8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:e14:: with SMTP id y20mr9114250qkm.335.1627128480698; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 05:08:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8242aca652161e867154eba4f9b5a65fa2ee9298.camel@odiso.com> <10e5b75a-0e2b-ed80-f188-38a9be4a5a14@tuxis.nl> In-Reply-To: From: Gilberto Ferreira Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 09:07:48 -0300 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.136 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT 0.25 Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox questions/features X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 12:08:12 -0000 Yeah! I have that impression too. Even the glusterfs plugin in the web interface doesn't work. Plante of times I have to use fstab to mount a gluster volume with two servers. Em s=C3=A1b, 24 de jul de 2021 08:30, Alex K escr= eveu: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021, 13:56 Alex K wrote: > > > Anyone has any feedback to share regarding the support of multiple > > glusterfs server nodes? > > > > May I assume that glusterfs is not used in production with Proxmox where > more then two servers in hyperconverged setup is a common use case? It is > my impression that Proxmox is more inclined towards ceph with glusterfs > being somehow a second class citizen. Correct me if I am wrong. > > Thanx > > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:44 PM Alex K wrote: > > > >> Resending as it seems screenshots are not accepted. > >> > >> Regarding the *backup-volfile-servers* option when attaching gluster > >> volumes, I tried to configure it from UI (DC -> Storage -> Add) as bel= ow > >> though it seems it is not supported. > >> I am getting the error: > >> > >> Parameter verification failed. (400) > >> *server2*: invalid format - value does not look like a valid server na= me > >> or IP address > >> > >> How can one define more than one backup server as below? > >> > >> backup-volfile-servers=3Dnode1,node2 > >> > >> This is useful when having a 3 replica or more gluster server setup. > >> > >> Thanx, > >> Alex > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 2:01 AM alexandre derumier > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Le vendredi 09 juillet 2021 =C3=A0 10:16 +0200, Mark Schouten a =C3= =A9crit : > >>> > Maybe easier to use the metric-server-service for that? > >>> > >>> it's more than we don't have some values currently, like vm real host > >>> cpu usage. (including vhost-net process for example), > >>> > >>> or real host memory usage (for windows, when ballonning is enabled, w= e > >>> don't see the zero filled memory by windows, so reserved on the host)= . > >>> > >>> My patches to get values from cgroups are already applied, > >>> but they are not yet exposed in pvestatd. > >>> > >>> > >>> I would like also to improve pve-ha-manager vm migration based on the > >>> hosts load too. > >>> > >>> > >>> I just need time to rework on this ^_^ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> pve-user mailing list > >>> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > >>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > >>> > >> > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >