From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <leandro@tecnetmza.com.ar>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1878D74DF3
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:07:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F083F22891
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:06:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 114C12287D
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:06:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id x20so30791905lfu.6
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 05:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=tecnetmza-com-ar.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=xMj9wsHNccBP6CX6wqnFasKMxNhczrFMbZnZqSegapA=;
 b=g9tbkuDjB4ojg+l8jB8ZMV5XPuxWjUYj18HwcR5ImVeb+pFxXe5uhAwdrhtzQIcgFE
 eys7MU1V0HQcJjwBElAoPAIqQA9cB7tM2oiUCiS6tX/4FhBBJk2OUd8IFnIprur/e2im
 D/2p37g+U72lOPtPy9epy5+zgPlZ68po8UjWNfrdM6DL+RyGlkO6COsXfBiae8cREpCd
 pJyPGLvE++GhYFhflehmXXb6UsmnGOb4aca65/0Nj4mlbcTzDYDBQuwIkC4G0g1pZkbg
 ZUdKsUndaKPXEXYMbl2OK5d23Az7rCce9rkaeWCFGsGXsQFjGqUZhk4Rta0Z+HhTo8Zi
 isgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=xMj9wsHNccBP6CX6wqnFasKMxNhczrFMbZnZqSegapA=;
 b=g2+nnHZMIcRfaNjXe46HXAULiqRZcz6Ffu4gDTbWJcdTWWDnHMS+FM73Q9AlT+FeQk
 fg9X0JWtfDG91hfUg1Q3UXy4P3aQqFngdTyp7568XEftj1krF+j8oLShAGrM4VraNqok
 V5xWKcQGDJeZxbV8BMFOdaOGVqQqzZTPCqEG4eCB9yaeUPQXD0SyBTkEDM3EfpLOCCFR
 HsNtkh2NarUT5nKjJaGgFdg4PObO/czFsxr6Fac7OexHlo6tZHbH9T1K5JDd7z9ZvH/2
 IunCSk+tXpjadUKoOjvmF1zB+yCOtxjKg9HuDP4wvBF5ovTPjpnKp0/m+i6X2E+V2+K+
 UX4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Ejzb4NNHRKijXhrsKt09CEGso2icHW7BoflkpFsv5fy6K3IX2
 52AZO3trEt9WYwsyZgbtt7bk/+sn4lf56BfwRdEFqT0gsv1M
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDn+cqh7brUgkOEQcotBcSPXIucLQbGstU6nLmlmk9Ucxmj/FQcIEBCUXd7csU3GONKddrXjblhPUxIrnfGOQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3f7:: with SMTP id
 n23mr15511477lfq.417.1618920391076; 
 Tue, 20 Apr 2021 05:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALt2oz6qSFaWYTZMrkWrc9tVsXB1hvX+ugzDbfnE_L+Fn3q=Gw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO6gj4_EtDMzB4bgMoE-cTzv2U6ERCXikzq5BWndo8FhmRC4=A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOWoYHqzeYnZoV0HKj30uuWv4cwPKB9GCAOF5sb5879axoSPEQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOWoYHqzeYnZoV0HKj30uuWv4cwPKB9GCAOF5sb5879axoSPEQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Leandro Roggerone <leandro@tecnetmza.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:06:21 -0300
Message-ID: <CALt2oz6c6FujPGDvhMN7waZYPk+jnRuA=3vWJnHMLrYbCfGKww@mail.gmail.com>
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  1
 AWL 0.211 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 HTML_MESSAGE            0.001 HTML included in message
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_SOFTFAIL 0.972 SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
 T_REMOTE_IMAGE           0.01 Message contains an external image
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] get the most of storage for a very old dell pe 2950.
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:07:11 -0000

Thank you guys.
I will try to buy 6 new drives.
Then I will let you know how it goes.
Regards.
Leandro.

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dlink&utm_c=
ampaign=3Dsig-email&utm_content=3Dwebmail>
Libre
de virus. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dlink&utm_c=
ampaign=3Dsig-email&utm_content=3Dwebmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

El lun, 19 abr 2021 a las 17:21, Dimitri Alexandris (<d.alexandris@gmail.co=
m>)
escribi=C3=B3:

> I have an old Dell 1950 with one cpu (2 disks).  Was 1+1G ram, added 16+1=
6
> and now have 34G.  Two power supplies.
>
> 1-  Never bothered to change SAS controller mode.
> 2-  SATA disks (up to 2T of course) work perfectly, never used transposer=
s.
> 3-  First worked with an internal SSD (at internal SATA port, plus an add=
on
> power cable) for OS (always ZFS) + 2 SATA disks (ZFS raid) for data.  3
> years, no problems.
> 4-  Now i bought 2 SAS 1T, with OS on them, and also works fine.
> 5-  Hot plugging disks is working fine.  I actually increased capacity wi=
th
> bigger disks without stopping anything this way.  Had 500G SATA before 1T
> SAS diks.
>
> I configure the 2 eths in OVS (openvswitch) bond mode, with several VLANS
> and internal networks (OVS IntPorts).
>
> In your case, with many SAS disks you will be fine with any configuration=
,
> e.g.:
>
> 3+3 x 2T =3D 6T ZFS raid, OS + data, the fastest combination, or
> 5+1 ZFS raidz, 10T space, with best capacity, or
> 4+2 ZFS raidz2, 8T space, also big, and safer.
>
> Do yourself a favour, and buy some decent SAS disks, at 7200rpm are very
> cheap.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 6:08 PM Kyle Schmitt <kyleaschmitt@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I run on R610s, so about the same generation I think.  I use the
> > hardware raid for mirrored boot drive only, and NFS over 10G for VM
> > storage, which is on a seperate system running FreeBSD + ZFS.
> >
> > But for your case: the general rule for any storage system is don't
> > mix.  You pick one and only one: hardware raid, software raid, zfs,
> > ceph, etc.  The exceptions are for systems you almost definitely won't
> > be using like luster and gluster.
> >
> > You can still do hotplug with JBOD mode, at least on the dell hardware
> > I've used.  I have no idea if it's officially supported or not.  I do
> > know that I sometimes have to use the raid tools to bring in a new
> > drive when it's NOT in JBOD mode.
> >
> > In the 6ish years I've run ZFS I've only had one drive fail (pure
> > luck, not skill), and it was trivial to swap out and replace.
> >
> > --Kyle
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 7:59 AM Leandro Roggerone
> > <leandro@tecnetmza.com.ar> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi guys , I received a very old del pe 2950 box.
> > > Fortunately it has 64 GB and a double power supply, so i'm thinking
> about
> > > using it with pve.
> > > After confirm with dell support about storage capacity:
> > > Max physical storage support is 2TB.
> > > Max virtual storage support is also 2TB.
> > > ##
> > > I was reading on previous emails at this mail list , about storage:
> > >  "putting the controller in JBOD mode
> > > and install directly with ZFS software RAID."
> > >
> > > I always thought that raid hardware controller was the best option bu=
t
> ,
> > > perhaps I can give it a try to ZFS software RAID with this old server
> > ....
> > > what do you think ?
> > > I have a bunch of 3.5" with odd capacities  unused drives.
> > > I readed that zfs can merge them to get a more efficient use.
> > > What about hot replace / remove or insert a new drive ?
> > > Will it work without service disruption in production environments ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Leandro.
> > >
> > > <
> >
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dlink&utm_=
campaign=3Dsig-email&utm_content=3Dwebmail
> > >
> > > Libre
> > > de virus. www.avast.com
> > > <
> >
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dlink&utm_=
campaign=3Dsig-email&utm_content=3Dwebmail
> > >
> > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pve-user mailing list
> > > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> > > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pve-user mailing list
> > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>
>