From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57D016C74C for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 14:06:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4B36E1D245 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 14:06:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B73F31D23A for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 14:06:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id q131so9693384pfq.10 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 05:06:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=POJs76Uor/JA9o+SPNfNVgtFl1nrUuv/UrIevmBTYmc=; b=HraBBnjXBPv+NetPv1GpCL0XJshqfBAebSQ4D7JAU18HqqIQ/tplJLSJl0bx5GV8Uv Cgy+mT0jf1PH7FXOsgA9QgFEXiFRMzz7VzYoPSAkNjlfIG6Oss1BCe+pYTIs1Q0VihP+ td980Cio/qJLJmTnlGUtGVTqDQ9/wISc/pMz61uJWPh44kp30C6JI8sbdEjBURLM6P7K ziKE/6sJeE/X841l0CfAAwAa91Ppl003DF896kyFIqAfcjfRP0I7moF54k/3HwquNoC1 Eb9tp1zTeEBrCw+8O8kWyaBSZ369gHy8+XwOc0Km6q2+Cgmqj+diBHfBP1sKycA8Y5co ksPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=POJs76Uor/JA9o+SPNfNVgtFl1nrUuv/UrIevmBTYmc=; b=Ya/z7IulznHujHmKYl7PgwCg8U26bFNHn8nA6HTem5jhWYuKtiW2NxiYsDBC+E0czR lXVx4Ns/dIYa6BCTxB6xFED/c6UZQOp8JcF4s7uFpKYRaDBJRqt85EbtbdT6IpwYNivA uKKztgnZjoAwqQuag7rnE0pxXY10Nb1Dwskf6Ax3PoeW8vcRbARFsMZcLJcD87YW1Kgc 59pKBSDQrMNofATIMk01QWsSu9XtjD/iW18bpBAxex88VFL3zD9hDD+HGfTM9NHafXYd Lseo1dGOsdVyHTLabtmslVOndcEcAtLAmdZkyEPebK0BmCu1qONUOHY+K787H7zRHqFC qjyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530SG7L75vkcW0562dyqV87kQ5Vt05uCUkiLXOXMx7MSoL7yuMlH uzFnPcF9Px9x5cYsJCwtrE88/iXTxkKcj5rG6B3L3ZXNZ3I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyP3VeqofaoCPXZXOBy4x8T/iapfGey2AMWtBMilc9LWsvjqe0c/qEPS/6F/K7plQKCWAt3Go6DTzTvSdRLvr4= X-Received: by 2002:a62:ddd1:0:b029:1b7:5651:f6ea with SMTP id w200-20020a62ddd10000b02901b75651f6eamr12415538pff.62.1612098397018; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 05:06:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <CAJH6TXgwKTpAZ_Jp=dGB__G+EGaJ_MxsSpFrV4EPPuHZWx8Hrw@mail.gmail.com> <ba6aa8c3-7c55-8abf-b427-57d3b6adaae0@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <ba6aa8c3-7c55-8abf-b427-57d3b6adaae0@proxmox.com> From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 14:06:25 +0100 Message-ID: <CAJH6TXgCAiH34d++7zNSA4vWUxbLaLX2J3+G6Kg2TvthX6EB9g@mail.gmail.com> To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Dominic Jaeger <d.jaeger@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Direct migration from XenServer to PVE X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 13:06:45 -0000 Il giorno gio 28 gen 2021 alle ore 16:55 Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> ha scritto: > Would it be enough if `qm importdisk` would accept stdin as source as long > as the image size explicitly passed as a paramter? Sorry for the late reply I think yes. I need a refactor on my side but yes, I think i can work with that, directly piping to "qm import"