From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <ayufan@ayufan.eu> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 699A869C7F for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:42:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 559C924AAD for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:42:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 4B21F24A99 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:42:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id z188so12272677qke.9 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 04:42:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ayufan-eu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=t/2obz9RwWTmRbacB53STm5GG9l48jEPebOCRmFvx1c=; b=WHMThDlPpxDGXVRuZ96X7z3mmPbU1nagJGCeEU+HMAW9+AhfTnWk1mRDZy+CcEWE3T 8C9xwYyp73cHqVigyDgbK9XDboF+r/8nf1QEqkx3zb0z+s3l2iBlQxOzWGxQlTpV7btd hHSfL3ucNG++x9PTlwl88ghMsrzUpGz9tCE40GibiLnxdA756cxv8kG7ZeGTTzHWMMY9 B0iQwspL1QdNiude1n3i98OYH3veSLFTE7Ej0fv9RSup5USYEcUFVCu9p+zwbDEMVAxS afLQ1274N0Lz6K+wpzeb7RfUJQxRY1CxuSbcfjioUaNsY1TiTY3YH3ejShtuQqeCRGyT 0xVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=t/2obz9RwWTmRbacB53STm5GG9l48jEPebOCRmFvx1c=; b=FkkHj/KhE/Btdr9haYbyjX25GYoQaG70SE0cZxDQurESbFCew/DqdO7YXw2kj49HNA ihfM7OpW4yNiqKnxLJOkHXUwOZlsrtaR4s07OoYRlft57PzmnSdSfT+XWVK+UiV4kcCX mE6GutI8Fqx8l6feWO7XG2BbPba3gZ3tpInnlC/c452RgtsykpZtzif18iCdEamaIYqD FEabR38Tmk2EkkYUDLM0eIGSowwQ31D3BXQlTc4SDuwD1kKbYfKV7kixQdVWW9aQw9CC fQlxhHLR5TDLRO+Vzor0t4J9qTotXIufJVbwd50/4xcU6KmoeXfZLf539SlavCNoJXoc 6hdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533fAKq2sYpRQ5EZYCYyN7rDlAC20L2GDvuYBuHL1FYOULdb3HNt JQTgtRS5UlNAZA1CcsdvLy7hhOSVDo7gSVRmqpufipOLMa8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKUOY9tYaOOkD8fQbNk7ILphIf4Dho3uJ3/UUrY1YYUGWIneEOOlcoy2z9qVqz+pw+Ta4Xb2m4TbzxDJoZCdo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:8d0:: with SMTP id z16mr24668908qkz.492.1607344931577; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 04:42:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <CAJ-Uffn1eVivrsxHxVJJjoUp-gJue0BHZ9coYACTssQBaoK+vQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Uffk_gWE9yqFQBn8WzRKf93hu_GtHoraoBj_gLDQNLKTqSw@mail.gmail.com> <1607327433.kteohg3dea.astroid@nora.none> In-Reply-To: <1607327433.kteohg3dea.astroid@nora.none> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Kamil_Trzci=C5=84ski?= <ayufan@ayufan.eu> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:42:00 +0100 Message-ID: <CAJ-UffmsnNEn57M1rGYco5Dqsrwa1GzAW6z=b_ZWbFje-sjphw@mail.gmail.com> To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.100 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Compiling PBS on arm64 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 12:42:20 -0000 Thank you Fabian :) I was looking for just that. I was able to remove `.cargo/config` and use `crates.io` to compile packages. I will post more results once it is done, but I got it rebuild at least on amd64, and waiting for arm64 to finish. Kamil On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:54 AM Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler < f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> wrote: > On December 6, 2020 8:41 pm, Kamil Trzci=C5=84ski wrote: > > I'm slightly progressing, but I stumbled across some `debcargo` problem= . > It > > appears that > > Proxmox uses their own fork of `debcargo`, which is needed in order to > > build crates > > without the usage of crates.io. Is this patch published somewhere? > > > > rust-debcargo (2.4.2-pve1) proxmox-rust; urgency=3Dmedium > > > > * allow overriding maintainer via debcargo.toml > > * implement local crate support.patch > > > > -- Proxmox Support Team <support@proxmox.com> Tue, 14 Jan 2020 > 16:13:48 > > +0100 > > > https://git.proxmox.com/?p=3Ddebcargo-conf.git;a=3Dtree;f=3Dsrc/debcargo/= debian/patches;h=3D7345cadea4cbffc3174c04e34960e91767892100;hb=3Drefs/heads= /proxmox/buster > > all of the toolchain backports are published as well on > git.proxmox.com.. if you want to re-compile all of our devel repo for > arm64, I suggest familiarizing yourself with debcargo and the > debcargo-conf repo (especially the upstream and Proxmox readmes) ;) > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:21 PM Kamil Trzci=C5=84ski <ayufan@ayufan.eu> = wrote: > > > >> ARM64 is becoming increasingly popular, especially that PBS seems at > least > >> for my usage-pattern to be ideal to run on my arm64 NAS. In the end > >> I want to try to be able to recompile everything for arm64 and see how > >> nicely > >> it works there. > >> > >> But first I decided to try to compile all packages for `amd64`. And I'= m > >> scratching my head > >> to try to do that. This proves to be super hard due to multitude of > >> dependencies that are backported, > >> unordered, and require a very special set of commands to be executed > >> depending on a git repo > >> since PBS is rust-based. > >> > >> Do you maybe happen to have a comprehensive guide that allows you to > >> compile everything > >> from the scratch without the use of `/devel` repo, ideally with some > kind > >> of CI scripts that would do this heavy lifting? > >> > >> Kamil Trzci=C5=84ski > >> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > pve-devel mailing list > > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel >