From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEBA6605C1 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:27:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E437C11292 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:27:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 271C11126F for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:27:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id i10so2242063ljn.2 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:27:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Q+MRZ1paQBoW613ysUBlncFKqmeCYCwi6669qBCE+sI=; b=Acxx8HuSTCypU8LMujjG93erDHoBX8034I59NtYn7THwXk1li+9pccNsgw8y3w2ckh 1nZpbcnWyXFjGtA8ofJfxziCtNIdQS6OGVKjIgMYQ1cWAxGIhWoHOwGYJuYDggUZxFnX 9KDqEjXKqpZ2/agZlb5HaijI5J4rkE7t+SuF4cS0+eB/hDyJXMcdlTyRWjb/y01czyZ3 4xixIWGdXxc3SxSdtc9BWcTWN+EChXgrxmuBHQe/AKP41NuVzuIiW/Tips8SCHFSIdXI EWo1jU1jKdRDp43GrJwD6qeAZbraCvKQuJz/fC7bJKsvtuSYxqkgNh/zKNlkuRgsGk3G 3uQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q+MRZ1paQBoW613ysUBlncFKqmeCYCwi6669qBCE+sI=; b=SOx1T2lO2eIDHvnRqbSDfCYN8q9gGOaMrLuDsjSZ+6/cECFpfCPplMKlcjHQ+oZKqj UFy0yH0Tt5d9S7nS7DAfeyRiuHy+YWSLSMzogxwVq7AjLW8W6o+KnJ8ErSU9uDMuWzDW 4fZeOhU2XdU+pQVKdlA0p/iJqvKWbmXZhtl8vfYSI+lwnLEVg3/otofuAtNJTdwhntpu qDrYRUgXFyQodlyzk4n8f324juCSiSylBnVZ8ho7yE6ZowM04ZFI+2G9eddKLNO4NDFJ GIxKKokez2KqBKqQKvxF5onnkNM2F+qjoRI+TryPUj0r4sbw1jjLna/5HJsI5P3zYt+q a1fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xCzoXpaDaJu0j1Xb+/X0gtrVPjOMBPm8fwjqJwzZCosMsDVMI wWSn+wrCy0wllDt1G3pdRfJ0qiMBroQYYp0+mUw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzc6+wCOh3qOFuNH57gxl/ccqlIXXphkMugcv2UHcNKvcI0s3iuGUaFsrX0Rl7ypcgDf5Z0Ke5B2+DMBnr820g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1182:: with SMTP id w2mr4950334ljo.197.1597238816291; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:26:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Yannis Milios Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:26:45 +0100 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list Cc: proxmoxve , Amin Vakil X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] LVM over ISCSI issue X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:27:04 -0000 On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 14:05, Amin Vakil via pve-user < pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> wrote: > > There isn't any useful log on qnap NAS, but most of times its RAM is > full and it doesn't have any cache. Maybe qnap prevents writing when > it's fully used and maybe proxmox thinks it has complete access over > /dev/sdb and therefore when it sees it cannot write gives an > input/output error. > Indeed, that would make sense... > Isn't there a tweak in proxmox to retry writing on iscsi until it succeeds? > I cannot comment on that, as I'm not using iscsi on pve. You can check in pve documentation or wiki, otherwise on open-iscsi documentation. Y.