From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <rightkicktech@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF53473FC1 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 09:40:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9B144140FE for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 09:40:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 89E7A1409B for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 09:40:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com with SMTP id g24so3070866vsa.10 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 00:40:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CA6DIjeXSpAekMtjI9OXJ8NKkHTdDgBBq6I32fw7pB0=; b=A2uQpVNt12BNSG3SJpaj4DopL2R9RR2UAKdpBJvil5pYJy3XwjT+HCqrHkXrjp8+ZX FUuuW0zKEDmm+B9Y4+defk9ErO6RYs3thwRXCIQmQyD0XvdbdTUn4IaWl+hD/NyuunXk NDcWIvCa05gAFoXQ53026mmYY91L99vdy1wAkiNXy/B1owQeJ6tFfy8amqiFdLa9FvgA XHPqyl4xlLcjJh4sqRJkhMQdpZSY0538PuCGB0Cj8UQlpgSvCVfMhNpSq0q37CdsUC1G rNRt0/9cd8iVP4ndmJRFYvJY5LAqMHQy/VKi7KHromaylDxjRoFxaRuuz0UNAuMIYBnM zG3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=CA6DIjeXSpAekMtjI9OXJ8NKkHTdDgBBq6I32fw7pB0=; b=CDoXxXUhHCuvvPM31fXMGF+kJfK3deZMy/eq6eO0hitH1WseRLBrLLBPhOXw5kc+w+ AS5EOL+r8SG6UMb9FnuHD4cGFUBapf1VIzsJJ5MruwIbRzzGnXNVIZ45XJcg9Z0+WArB kMNs33brYnYB/uIorQQ+Yhve8TEjOEuqSr4kDeaf/c1b3aGNryjrcsa+aiWm8Yid77jd Uhjsfv9wbOKXYsWVnK5rDenSYScfOPs7NGDWe85pDiwlWv3XejEJj933G8Ho23Yp0Nfj 5JvUjQNZcrSc3PeSaWe0HWd9mlHvgVDER9nXNyvktbORUVjDqglawPolEDOahgj0wYiY JBWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530uSF8NXo/dtknnHIhxeri2nZlITaS/ZU63620oKtgjxP8930ec 1UKRk1TGdzrJJpd7gggT7FsibKegePmof8QbryiDHIU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxC4AcWxKnhY1RcDQoPN1NpWOcnA7Iaqe0F+EcIzQun8kkf2xW38tMWemi2Ewl1AL46hUlyFYZuUPnvsh77sK8= X-Received: by 2002:a67:7fd5:: with SMTP id a204mr7713792vsd.8.1625730012068; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 00:40:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <CABMULt+xJYXFcV41seOqGrAz-5yjWr2NpUcA3hUxh0k3zJ5uaw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CABMULt+xJYXFcV41seOqGrAz-5yjWr2NpUcA3hUxh0k3zJ5uaw@mail.gmail.com> From: Alex K <rightkicktech@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 10:40:01 +0300 Message-ID: <CABMULtL50PNMjqe8+7DNh0P3k5Zf27_hFMYq2-voL1V0g1xw2A@mail.gmail.com> To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.025 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD 0.001 HTML font face is not a word HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox questions/features X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 07:40:20 -0000 Hi all, Anyone has any info to share for the below? Many thanx On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 12:00 PM Alex K <rightkicktech@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been assessing Proxmox for the last couple of days, coming from a > previous experience with oVirt. The intent is to switch to this solution if > most of the features are covered. > > The below questions might have been put again, though searching the forum > or online I was not able to find any specific reference or not sure if the > feedback is still relevant. > > - When adding a gluster volume I see that the UI provides an option for a > secondary server. In case I have a 3 replica glusterfs setup where I need > to add two backup servers as below, how can this be defined? > > backup-volfile-servers=node1,node2 > > > - I've read that qemu does use *libgfapi* when accessing VM disks on > glusterfs volumes. Can someone confirm this? I tried to find out the VM > configs that may reference this detail but was not able to do so. > > - I have not seen any *load balancing/scheduling* feature being provided > and looking through the forum it seems that this is still missing. Is there > any future plan to provide such a feature. By load balancing I mean to > automatically balance VMs through the available hosts/nodes depending on a > set policy (CPU load, memory load or other). > > > Thanx for reading and appreciate any feedback, > > Alex > > > >