From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A3C7775AE for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 15:02:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C21559DFD for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 15:01:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vs1-xe34.google.com (mail-vs1-xe34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 9F6CB9DE6 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 15:01:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vs1-xe34.google.com with SMTP id x22so9332717vsq.5 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:01:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=icJH6EKNZ7UZJix4On7q7VWShdpofLDpK5C99m8hnXs=; b=H16/FwWqrplth7pU+8JQkZdOEPWL5VPqkLlq4tLA2MzddLS4bd+JxGouEe+H/Sf1Ti 63bx+NNPH+G41IdAI2EXZK9+CUuCUail3g3VpHwqnvq1SmlxwRagAmoa7tYvUBiwX01M 3TqCfr7Uk3Ga5l8N3JUsKhyM+oUcmhNPc2NyJWSGZrlfGbhIHdmPgHpcDdQ3PPmdpq9h DqPYAP/Us3Mw+RSWrz8EfT/rXAvgwnHbDjESL6ankoT5lDFW+K0PHdCz7cXF1gkhP6GN k+Mf8dvkz/WaG0uypa8MqIEYnPixmyVQW6W8xejac8EKg+e9U4pPOOiW6Sno9bJniMFq d9bA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=icJH6EKNZ7UZJix4On7q7VWShdpofLDpK5C99m8hnXs=; b=ph20FcMZlYzLgCROnt3J7zNtTxHQL/djC1eNNv8RrcvuBBrCLHTGFo9D9Ny6+hKC3e uxa8E1HIvkZg6RrssZOzc7MqbUSOtw84mGX0cXLY2XKsATcRgSiLwGDdxzeytgyWMT8G xy+33fkRdSwyebtu8J8MtZO2oaTXkc1jmAFDF3aU5a6XKBobXnuCVMi89ebKStqknR5i YCKmxkxTb6t/0BC3sXF7Ea5BfcdlvoD3JrlCaBUIhj9EDZBUtc84fdVb7m72JHKZC75b DCJ2iuwbgDWS6+p0WKYvsjG9pyZEwRWKmH4VwvuOLci6srG7En93qTL/lc3Mj1vp6u2H sNQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kFos8kT2GUG/LO7zJIQmzx6VDxJm1s2h+viz+uj59mqa2/8ei cyinhJlmdF4MZqoQxm2VgYYocCp32jYPVPDu7HHdbemiVg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwY+VkShRgZbGPrslAUlpL/12rpzmPmVebt9cxEYMT7sMx5yJf4mt9+GOi+7nj4MmkRaOYCG2ITMsmHbB40NRo= X-Received: by 2002:a67:d314:: with SMTP id a20mr25856674vsj.58.1626786089910; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:01:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8242aca652161e867154eba4f9b5a65fa2ee9298.camel@odiso.com> <10e5b75a-0e2b-ed80-f188-38a9be4a5a14@tuxis.nl> In-Reply-To: From: Alex K Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:01:18 +0300 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.047 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [gluster.org, readthedocs.io, proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox questions/features X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:02:10 -0000 On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 2:45 PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everybody. > > I had read this in the Gluster qemu integration ( > > https://staged-gluster-docs.readthedocs.io/en/release3.7.0beta1/Features/= qemu-integration/ > ) > > > - Tuning the volume for virt-store > > There are recommended settings available for virt-store. This provide > good performance characteristics when enabled on the volume that was > used > for virt-store > > Refer to > > http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Virt-store-useca= se#Tunables > for recommended tunables and for applying them on the volume, > > http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Virt-store-useca= se#Applying_the_Tunables_on_the_volume > > These links seem broken. > > This could apply to Proxmox as well??? > I do not see why not. Apart from what is recommended, I also enable sharding at 512MB size. > > Thanks > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram > > > > > > > Em ter., 20 de jul. de 2021 =C3=A0s 07:57, Alex K > escreveu: > > > Anyone has any feedback to share regarding the support of multiple > > glusterfs server nodes? > > Thanx > > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:44 PM Alex K wrote: > > > > > Resending as it seems screenshots are not accepted. > > > > > > Regarding the *backup-volfile-servers* option when attaching gluster > > > volumes, I tried to configure it from UI (DC -> Storage -> Add) as > below > > > though it seems it is not supported. > > > I am getting the error: > > > > > > Parameter verification failed. (400) > > > *server2*: invalid format - value does not look like a valid server > name > > > or IP address > > > > > > How can one define more than one backup server as below? > > > > > > backup-volfile-servers=3Dnode1,node2 > > > > > > This is useful when having a 3 replica or more gluster server setup. > > > > > > Thanx, > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 2:01 AM alexandre derumier < > aderumier@odiso.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Le vendredi 09 juillet 2021 =C3=A0 10:16 +0200, Mark Schouten a =C3= =A9crit : > > >> > Maybe easier to use the metric-server-service for that? > > >> > > >> it's more than we don't have some values currently, like vm real hos= t > > >> cpu usage. (including vhost-net process for example), > > >> > > >> or real host memory usage (for windows, when ballonning is enabled, = we > > >> don't see the zero filled memory by windows, so reserved on the host= ). > > >> > > >> My patches to get values from cgroups are already applied, > > >> but they are not yet exposed in pvestatd. > > >> > > >> > > >> I would like also to improve pve-ha-manager vm migration based on th= e > > >> hosts load too. > > >> > > >> > > >> I just need time to rework on this ^_^ > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> pve-user mailing list > > >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > > >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pve-user mailing list > > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >