From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <rightkicktech@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30849775D2 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:01:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 18428AE37 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:01:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id DD520AE23 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:01:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com with SMTP id f4so11264480vsh.11 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 07:01:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BLcazyOsoxf4yJIqZ+u5eUpSxrxNm36nSDsJ/iB4KaQ=; b=PxtQe7xT75uKKfbsyLkrXwHsNe4uzPu0ddvcMWMoDENwixxivRSkOuYqu0A6NNHZJe aGZLo8RcAIYnzDOZ3UaBu41fk56adNrIiVY1oGaOzbx3fdWXqijN6XGAkScSksmAmnz+ hlKAH2ZXmA0MlBAy+rEgMy5k1+fCsspQHq1PvZs0oYPcpzVCnO0slsz2EePeZ1dkvzTq 9sBqFcQ7p3FU+1eDOdT+1E5bhKT/W72t9zxgyd2NsCrV7ri5/JsU7k8EDCBuHe0BCer8 boQw/Gzd8YdjuW4YD9DelF6s5BlkUQFuzOe5w3fAkByEvYHnwdhp18+NiGT5zL1st52O 5EKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=BLcazyOsoxf4yJIqZ+u5eUpSxrxNm36nSDsJ/iB4KaQ=; b=A95J/7afx8jW3K0Tm+bNgR/cr8qh+QW9YvdCNDn0VgM55NztLpddyw5tzPphKy6Eii ch6pm/YBMoubgjmU1SQ0xbzRIaoFypkXDL1hPMLS39tKj2bjr8NGxYyanznbIGMvtLAh 1aCvSivDmk6jynDpwggz6Ysvz3HWjkPxloV2xgYNypMy2iPOjRPGL9hob/M6EyAN/Pc5 AyvoCeHKXkVv+TmSQgqKxUoRBFaHeEKuvG/3ttY8UPawJ9AC8BIUikdGANf6XAPlbvhJ pmShi7CW/FfDI13W1AwpUZBH6I01HOi1iByAdWuFmggqqedRTypzthy8LgQ5A7ShDpfo Iqxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jGXvUIqhkRBVK+lbvrUoAdBGJwbEkv6OsjJ7SGGK235ifffj+ 9OVzqNQJiQpk/dTLZ8pZtx559FUoMoDWjObaM/WUosqZwg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfeLIyt5RfzrwHN4KhGZCNVuiqTBgTPd7QtwYTBC1MTz+kNZ1Atv06fyctLXY8gEoJRzcuoIB8KD1OkeCDt74= X-Received: by 2002:a67:b143:: with SMTP id z3mr29222577vsl.57.1626789694899; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 07:01:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <CABMULt+xJYXFcV41seOqGrAz-5yjWr2NpUcA3hUxh0k3zJ5uaw@mail.gmail.com> <CABMULtL50PNMjqe8+7DNh0P3k5Zf27_hFMYq2-voL1V0g1xw2A@mail.gmail.com> <8242aca652161e867154eba4f9b5a65fa2ee9298.camel@odiso.com> <10e5b75a-0e2b-ed80-f188-38a9be4a5a14@tuxis.nl> <b6ea28e9082af7bb22fe0baa06362f7c4b5279ae.camel@odiso.com> <CABMULtLUMn4KfN4a7yOdFMTL7=uvSrwDLrH1FwQUaBDpBdUeUw@mail.gmail.com> <CABMULt+kcS_wroqVYu5t-J3PYDnP_v=pOwONbz3t_dG6uvtbeg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOKSTBtP1+k2_gzgyibQvt8tM374yC_Vr8d5a2NzSkaF6ZNoSw@mail.gmail.com> <CABMULtKJzkUL7dZvckyWAEhAwzsDY_vV1D6ha3MFte8RHm-YFQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CABMULtKJzkUL7dZvckyWAEhAwzsDY_vV1D6ha3MFte8RHm-YFQ@mail.gmail.com> From: Alex K <rightkicktech@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:01:23 +0300 Message-ID: <CABMULtJB9PethOLGeH7GXdicALottRkoHPBScZq=m1sh5SUV=Q@mail.gmail.com> To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.043 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [gluster.org, readthedocs.io, proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox questions/features X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:01:43 -0000 On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 4:01 PM Alex K <rightkicktech@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 2:45 PM Gilberto Ferreira < > gilberto.nunes32@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi everybody. >> >> I had read this in the Gluster qemu integration ( >> >> https://staged-gluster-docs.readthedocs.io/en/release3.7.0beta1/Features= /qemu-integration/ >> ) >> >> >> - Tuning the volume for virt-store >> >> There are recommended settings available for virt-store. This provide >> good performance characteristics when enabled on the volume that was >> used >> for virt-store >> >> Refer to >> >> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Virt-store-usec= ase#Tunables >> for recommended tunables and for applying them on the volume, >> >> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Virt-store-usec= ase#Applying_the_Tunables_on_the_volume >> >> These links seem broken. > >> >> This could apply to Proxmox as well??? >> > I do not see why not. Apart from what is recommended, I also enable > sharding at 512MB size. > Caution on the sharding part. You must not enable/disable sharding at a volume that has already data in it as it will cause data corruption. Sharding must be enabled only at a fresh volume. > >> >> Thanks >> --- >> Gilberto Nunes Ferreira >> (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Em ter., 20 de jul. de 2021 =C3=A0s 07:57, Alex K <rightkicktech@gmail.c= om> >> escreveu: >> >> > Anyone has any feedback to share regarding the support of multiple >> > glusterfs server nodes? >> > Thanx >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:44 PM Alex K <rightkicktech@gmail.com> wrote= : >> > >> > > Resending as it seems screenshots are not accepted. >> > > >> > > Regarding the *backup-volfile-servers* option when attaching gluster >> > > volumes, I tried to configure it from UI (DC -> Storage -> Add) as >> below >> > > though it seems it is not supported. >> > > I am getting the error: >> > > >> > > Parameter verification failed. (400) >> > > *server2*: invalid format - value does not look like a valid server >> name >> > > or IP address >> > > >> > > How can one define more than one backup server as below? >> > > >> > > backup-volfile-servers=3Dnode1,node2 >> > > >> > > This is useful when having a 3 replica or more gluster server setup. >> > > >> > > Thanx, >> > > Alex >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 2:01 AM alexandre derumier < >> aderumier@odiso.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Le vendredi 09 juillet 2021 =C3=A0 10:16 +0200, Mark Schouten a =C3= =A9crit : >> > >> > Maybe easier to use the metric-server-service for that? >> > >> >> > >> it's more than we don't have some values currently, like vm real ho= st >> > >> cpu usage. (including vhost-net process for example), >> > >> >> > >> or real host memory usage (for windows, when ballonning is enabled, >> we >> > >> don't see the zero filled memory by windows, so reserved on the >> host). >> > >> >> > >> My patches to get values from cgroups are already applied, >> > >> but they are not yet exposed in pvestatd. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> I would like also to improve pve-ha-manager vm migration based on t= he >> > >> hosts load too. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> I just need time to rework on this ^_^ >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> pve-user mailing list >> > >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> > >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >> > >> >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > pve-user mailing list >> > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >> >