From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEA4D8F27
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 20:26:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9A9B824133
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 20:25:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 20:25:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D907244B95
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 20:25:37 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <9fbf6ee5-94bd-df29-d50d-bae133078cd4@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 20:25:37 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:107.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/107.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
References: <20221025081046.93094-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221025081046.93094-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: =?UTF-8?Q?0=0A=09?=AWL -0.031 Adjusted
 score from AWL reputation of From: =?UTF-8?Q?address=0A=09?=BAYES_00 -1.9
 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 =?UTF-8?Q?Alignment=0A=09?=SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an
 SPF =?UTF-8?Q?Record=0A=09?=SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF
 =?UTF-8?Q?record=0A=09?=URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query
 to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [pools.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH manager v4 1/2] api: ceph: add
 applications of each pool to the lspools endpoint
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 19:26:08 -0000

Am 25/10/2022 um 10:10 schrieb Stefan Sterz:
> since ceph luminous (ceph 12) pools need to be associated with at
> least one applicaton. expose this information here too so that clients
> of this endpoint can use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
> ---
> v3: add an api viewer entry for the applications object.
> v4: re-use the 'osd dump' command's result instead of issueing another 
>     command.
> 
> thanks @ alwin antreich for pointing out that pools have applications!
> 
>  PVE/API2/Ceph/Pools.pm | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
>

applied both patches with Aaron's T-b tag, thanks!