From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D05A6183F for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:37:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6B0A42C7EF for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:37:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5C27B2C7E3 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:37:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2A291440DE for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:37:08 +0100 (CET) To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> References: <20201203150140.15040-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Message-ID: <9cb3d543-3733-8449-6dfc-2db08f4d1f62@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:37:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:84.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/84.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201203150140.15040-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.074 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [pvestatd.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH manager] pvestatd: fix container cpuset scheduling X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 15:37:09 -0000 On 03.12.20 16:01, Dominik Csapak wrote: > Since pve-container commit >=20 > c48a25452dccca37b3915e49b7618f6880aeafb1 >=20 > the code to get the cpuset controller path lives in pve-commons PVE::CG= roup. > Use that and improve the logging in case some error happens in the futu= re. > Such an error will only be logged once per pvestatd run, > so it does not spam the log. That was worded confusingly for me, I thought you mean "once per pvestatd= update loop run", but it is actually only the first loop (which I like more ^^) >=20 > Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> > --- > PVE/Service/pvestatd.pm | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >=20 > applied, thanks!