From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4EF57B08C for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 13:15:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A55AF2154A for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 13:14:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 3B8F22153F for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 13:14:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0CD2042D85 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 13:14:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <9c3f6f7a-cfa9-b4d2-c06e-ad93a9a9e204@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 13:14:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/89.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> References: <20210510085234.775062-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20210510085234.775062-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.006 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pbs-devel] applied-series: [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/4] fix #3391: improve mismatched fingerprint handling X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 11:15:13 -0000 On 10.05.21 10:52, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote: > if the expected fingerprint and the one returned by the server don't > match, print a warning and allow confirmation and proceeding if running= > interactive. >=20 > previous: >=20 > $ proxmox-backup-client ... > Error: error trying to connect: error:1416F086:SSL routines:tls_process= _server_certificate:certificate verify failed:../ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c= :1915: >=20 > new: >=20 > $ proxmox-backup-client ... > WARNING: certificate fingerprint does not match expected fingerprint! > expected: ac:cb:6a:bc:d6:b7:b4:77:3e:17:05:d6:b6:29:dd:1f:05:9c:2b:3= a:df:84:3b:4d:f9:06:2c:be:da:06:52:12 > fingerprint: ab:cb:6a:bc:d6:b7:b4:77:3e:17:05:d6:b6:29:dd:1f:05:9c:2b:3= a:df:84:3b:4d:f9:06:2c:be:da:06:52:12 > Are you sure you want to continue connecting? (y/n): n > Error: error trying to connect: error:1416F086:SSL routines:tls_process= _server_certificate:certificate verify failed:../ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c= :1915: >=20 > Signed-off-by: Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> > --- > src/client/http_client.rs | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >=20 > applied all four patches, thanks!