From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA15462474 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:29:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C50672E7CA for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:28:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A20492E7BA for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:28:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6F68744699 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:28:52 +0200 (CEST) To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20200820115010.14106-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Message-ID: <9a8916ab-d796-1cb1-a930-e5c69baea972@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:28:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:80.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/80.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200820115010.14106-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.078 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [pvesm.pm, prunebackups.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH storage 1/2] prune_backups: fix message X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:29:23 -0000 On 20.08.20 13:50, Fabian Ebner wrote: > For prune selections, it doesn't matter what the current time is, > only the timestamps of the backups matter. > > Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> > --- > > Sorry for missing this when I sent the series. > > PVE/API2/Storage/PruneBackups.pm | 5 ++--- > PVE/CLI/pvesm.pm | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > applied series, thanks!