From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F19FF9C67F for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:37:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CBD9680CA for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:36:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:36:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8C73944B30 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:36:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <97e07480-e398-4c8d-b90c-fc1477bfa3bb@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:36:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>, Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20231023154302.2558918-1-p.hufnagl@proxmox.com> <20231023154302.2558918-3-p.hufnagl@proxmox.com> <396f3ef0-79f0-4ded-bebf-a4a1ebe07427@proxmox.com> From: Philipp Hufnagl <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <396f3ef0-79f0-4ded-bebf-a4a1ebe07427@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.071 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/3] ui: Show if Filter includes or excludes X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:37:12 -0000 On 10/24/23 14:27, Lukas Wagner wrote: > > > On 10/23/23 17:43, Philipp Hufnagl wrote: >> To make the UI compatible, the Group Filter dialogue has been extended >> by a "behaviour" column which will show if the filter includes or >> excludes the matches. >> > > Oh, and maybe do a s/behaviour/behavior/g - we generally prefer > US English over UK English. > Actually I wondered about that too. If no one finds a good reason why we should leave 'behaviour', I will s/behaviour/behavior/g.