From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F19FF9C67F
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:37:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CBD9680CA
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:36:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:36:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8C73944B30
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:36:40 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <97e07480-e398-4c8d-b90c-fc1477bfa3bb@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:36:39 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20231023154302.2558918-1-p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
 <20231023154302.2558918-3-p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
 <396f3ef0-79f0-4ded-bebf-a4a1ebe07427@proxmox.com>
From: Philipp Hufnagl <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <396f3ef0-79f0-4ded-bebf-a4a1ebe07427@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.071 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/3] ui: Show if Filter
 includes or excludes
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:37:12 -0000



On 10/24/23 14:27, Lukas Wagner wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/23/23 17:43, Philipp Hufnagl wrote:
>> To make the UI compatible, the Group Filter dialogue has been extended
>> by a "behaviour" column which will show if the filter includes or
>> excludes the matches.
>>
> 
> Oh, and maybe do a s/behaviour/behavior/g - we generally prefer
> US English over UK English.
> 

Actually I wondered about that too. If no one finds a good reason why
we should leave 'behaviour', I will s/behaviour/behavior/g.