From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A308748A0
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  2 Jun 2021 12:49:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7D4DAA129
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  2 Jun 2021 12:49:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id ABFC4A11B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  2 Jun 2021 12:49:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7033E436FB;
 Wed,  2 Jun 2021 12:49:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 12:48:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
To: wb <webmaster@jbsky.fr>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <966663888.3483.1622630895184@webmail.proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.5-Rev11
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.044 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] 
 =?utf-8?b?UkXCoDogUkXCoDogIFtQQVRDSF0gW1BBVENIIHB2?=
 =?utf-8?q?e-access-control=5D_SSO_feature=3Alogin_with_SAMLv2?=
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 10:49:07 -0000


> On 06/02/2021 12:16 PM wb <webmaster@jbsky.fr> wrote:
> 
> 
> > I also wonder why SAML? Would it be an option to use OpenId connect instead?
> As I was able to use SAML, I know the functional part and therefore, if I used SAML, it is only by ease.
> 
> Switch to OpenID, why not. The time I set up a functional POC.
> 
> On the other hand, I would like to know your constraints.

Sorry, what do you want to know exactly?

> Do you still want to use Rust? 

Yes. But I am still searching for usable crates:

openidconnect: https://github.com/ramosbugs/openidconnect-rs

Seems promising, but I have not done any testing so far...

> If yes, I am curious to know how to bind perl to Rust? Do you have an example?

https://git.proxmox.com/?p=perlmod.git;a=summary

Hope the inline docs and examples are good enough to start...

> I noticed from our exchange :
> During an API call, if the user is not authenticated, do not pass in private and privileged the writing on /tmp/.

yes, unprivileged users should not be able to write anything.