From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91E669E1F7
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:52:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6E9B639AF
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:52:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:52:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9670544A5E
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:52:07 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <924f16d9-542a-4dfc-b374-db7ab7ad589b@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:52:06 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB-large
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20230801092954.1686860-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20230801092954.1686860-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230801092954.1686860-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.062 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [datastore.rs, environment.rs]
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [RFC PATCH proxmox-backup 1/3] api-types: make
 UploadStatistic an api type
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:52:08 -0000

On 01.08.23 11:29, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> and move it to pbs_api_types. We'll want this to expose on the api.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  pbs-api-types/src/datastore.rs | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  src/api2/backup/environment.rs | 35 +------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/pbs-api-types/src/datastore.rs b/pbs-api-types/src/datastore.rs
> index 73c4890e..41db680c 100644
> --- a/pbs-api-types/src/datastore.rs
> +++ b/pbs-api-types/src/datastore.rs
> @@ -419,6 +419,44 @@ pub struct SnapshotVerifyState {
>      pub state: VerifyState,
>  }
>  
> +#[api()]
> +#[derive(Copy, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)]

misses: 

#[serde(rename_all = "kebab-case")]

or does that break manifest?

If, then mabye a simple clone/wrapper struct for the API would be nicer,
so that those two use-cases get decoupled explicitly.

> +/// Chunk upload statistics of a snapshot
> +pub struct UploadStatistic {
> +    /// Amount of chunks uploaded (incl. duplicates)
> +    pub count: u64,
> +    /// Uncompressed bytes uploaded
> +    pub size: u64,
> +    /// Compressed bytes uploaded
> +    pub compressed_size: u64,
> +    /// Amount of duplicate chunks uploaded
> +    pub duplicates: u64,
> +}
> +