From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58CE11FF145
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 05 Feb 2026 08:58:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 03CC679F8;
	Thu,  5 Feb 2026 08:58:39 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <92284865-dd01-4cfa-a398-a94d639d9510@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 08:58:01 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
Subject: applied: [PATCH proxmox-i18n] update Simplified Chinese translations
To: Kefu Chai <k.chai@proxmox.com>, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20260130073139.248418-2-k.chai@proxmox.com>
 <20260204052055.544446-1-k.chai@proxmox.com>
 <20260204052055.544446-2-k.chai@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20260204052055.544446-2-k.chai@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1770278204011
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                    -0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked.  See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked.  See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked.  See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: OA2RU5CRAENU7GPW6YWQDBYHFSMUWDAR
X-Message-ID-Hash: OA2RU5CRAENU7GPW6YWQDBYHFSMUWDAR
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

Am 04.02.26 um 10:10 schrieb Kefu Chai:
> Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai <k.chai@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  zh_CN.po | 28898 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 13216 insertions(+), 15682 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!

Rebased the patch on the latest master and fixed up some issues in the PO
file though. There were a handful of duplicate mesgid's (might be a good
reason to add context to them for differentiation? Like for Pool with
Resource Pool vs. Storage Pool, @Maximiliano). Further, one plural variant
was wrong (wrongly used `msgstr` over the in such cases correct `msgstr[0]`).