From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8DBA1FF16B for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 23:58:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 14D7BC76D; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 23:58:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <917c568b-5a3d-466d-bbfb-87c20930e765@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 23:58:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , Maximiliano Sandoval References: <20250813124347.452585-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> Content-Language: de-DE From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20250813124347.452585-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1756245495017 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.029 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox v2 0/3] fix #6161: time: Split parse_time_spec parser into two X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" On 13/08/2025 14:43, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote: > In a support case we found a system with 40:00 as a schedule in a backup job. It > is possible to entire this calendar event on the web UI. > > As per systemd-analize: > > ``` > $ systemd-analyze calendar 40:00 > Failed to parse calendar specification '40:00': Invalid argument > ``` > > After this series the Proxmox VE web UI won't allow it anymore with an error: > > ``` > Parameter verification failed. (400) > > schedule: invalid format - invalid calendar event '40:00' - unable to parse calendar event at ':00' - Nom(Eof) > ``` > What about the backward compat concerns from Dominik and Fiona, I see nothing written anywhere in this series addressing them, or did I just overlooked that? Could we treat only serializing strict and deserializing not? > Differences from v1: > - Add cover letter > - Reference bugzilla entry #6161 > - Add test case for 24:00 as per #6161 > > Maximiliano Sandoval (3): > time: Add traits to DateTimeValue and TimeSpec > fix #6161: time: Split parse_time_spec parser into two > time: Add more calendat event tests > > proxmox-time/src/calendar_event.rs | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > proxmox-time/src/date_time_value.rs | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel