From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCE221FF38C
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 31 May 2024 14:08:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E9263349AD;
Fri, 31 May 2024 14:09:08 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <8ed1421b-f9f4-420e-8536-c17eaf721187@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 14:09:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20240419124556.3334691-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
<20240419124556.3334691-5-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240419124556.3334691-5-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.059 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 -
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [pci.pm, usb.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH guest-common v3 4/4] mapping: remove
find_on_current_node
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Am 19.04.24 um 14:45 schrieb Dominik Csapak:
> they only have one user each (where we can inline the implementation).
> It's easy enough to recreate should we need to.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
> src/PVE/Mapping/PCI.pm | 10 ----------
> src/PVE/Mapping/USB.pm | 9 ---------
> 2 files changed, 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/Mapping/PCI.pm b/src/PVE/Mapping/PCI.pm
> index b525c07..9c2b8b2 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/Mapping/PCI.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/Mapping/PCI.pm
> @@ -214,16 +214,6 @@ sub write_pci_config {
> cfs_write_file($FILENAME, $cfg);
> }
>
> -sub find_on_current_node {
> - my ($id) = @_;
> -
> - my $cfg = PVE::Mapping::PCI::config();
> - my $node = PVE::INotify::nodename();
> -
> - # ignore errors
> - return get_node_mapping($cfg, $id, $node);
> -}
> -
> sub get_node_mapping {
> my ($cfg, $id, $nodename) = @_;
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/Mapping/USB.pm b/src/PVE/Mapping/USB.pm
> index 34bc3cb..6dd15c4 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/Mapping/USB.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/Mapping/USB.pm
> @@ -155,15 +155,6 @@ sub write_usb_config {
> cfs_write_file($FILENAME, $cfg);
> }
>
> -sub find_on_current_node {
> - my ($id) = @_;
> -
> - my $cfg = config();
> - my $node = PVE::INotify::nodename();
> -
> - return get_node_mapping($cfg, $id, $node);
> -}
> -
> sub get_node_mapping {
> my ($cfg, $id, $nodename) = @_;
>
Seems like the use PVE::INotify; statements can be dropped too now.
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel