From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B39DB61AF8 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:42:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 958381AED0 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:41:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 276291AEC2 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:41:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DFC08446D2 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:41:30 +0200 (CEST) To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com> References: <20200813120334.20928-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com> <20200813120334.20928-2-s.reiter@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Message-ID: <8eb1f6b6-311c-5c33-237b-0601889b4f3d@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:41:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:80.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/80.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200813120334.20928-2-s.reiter@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.431 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -2.899 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu 1/4] PVE: add query-pbs-bitmap-info QMP call X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:42:01 -0000 On 13.08.20 14:03, Stefan Reiter wrote: > Returns advanced information about dirty bitmaps used (or not used) for > the latest PBS backup. > removing the "dirty" field breaks reporting in older qemu-server versions, I'd would like to avoid that if it isn't to big of a hassle..