From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve@junkyard.4t2.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6351632AD for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:15:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C59111ECFC for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:15:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mxf.4t2.com (mxf.4t2.com [78.47.65.59]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 895691ECEE for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:15:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Status: No X-4t2Systems-MailScanner-Watermark: 1598890480.39938@l5qlw/T2ucm6djLYwp4bjw X-4t2Systems-MailScanner-From: pve@junkyard.4t2.com X-4t2Systems-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-4t2Systems-MailScanner-ID: 382484087B.AA342 X-4t2Systems-MailScanner-Information: processed at mxf.4t2.com Received: from mailrelay.abyss.4t2.com (mailrelay.abyss.4t2.com [192.168.1.11]) by mxf.4t2.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382484087B for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:14:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailserv.abyss.4t2.com (mailserv.abyss.4t2.com [192.168.1.12]) by mailrelay.abyss.4t2.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC1B3A2 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:14:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from morgoth.abyss.4t2.com (morgoth.abyss.4t2.com [192.168.1.22]) (Authenticated sender: x) by mailserv.abyss.4t2.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 178E1206BD for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:14:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <890269350b55f29457cd32bc35911a66ebcd36f3.camel@junkyard.4t2.com> From: Tom Weber <pve@junkyard.4t2.com> To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:14:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <494606189.360.1598284149700@webmail.proxmox.com> References: <d4c75d3b-88e6-36db-9c05-88254a305d4a@it-functions.nl> <1877466395.127.1598159022900@webmail.proxmox.com> <292235591.128.1598159408132@webmail.proxmox.com> <15c9ed01-6e88-b3c6-6efd-cb5c881904fb@it-functions.nl> <169647259.135.1598192643864@webmail.proxmox.com> <4da8f252-3599-6af2-f398-3c7ac0010045@it-functions.nl> <41585d8d-d0be-3c71-b2fa-380731133fe7@it-functions.nl> <522191112.137.1598244794966@webmail.proxmox.com> <97fb389a-daae-2787-eac1-39ed2ac23be4@it-functions.nl> <494606189.360.1598284149700@webmail.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] More than 10 interfaces in lxc containers X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 16:15:01 -0000 Am Montag, den 24.08.2020, 17:49 +0200 schrieb Dietmar Maurer: > > On 08/24/2020 12:54 PM Stephan Leemburg <sleemburg@it-functions.nl> > > wrote: > > > > > > On 24-08-2020 06:53, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > > > If I don't put a tag on the device, it seems to behave like a > > > > trunk. So, > > > > that would solve my problem. _If_ the hosts where openvswitch > > > > enabled. > > > I am unable to see why you need openvswitch for that? This also > > > works with > > > standard linux network. > > > > Hi Dietmar, > > > > Oh, that is new for me. > > > > So, I can have a vlan aware traditional bridge in the firewall > > that > > receives tagged frames and at the same time have the clients on > > the > > specific 'vlans' receive non-tagged frames for their respective > > pvid? > > > > How can this be configured in Proxmox? > > You do not not any special config on the pve host if you do all VLAN > related > stuff inside the VM. You do realize that Stephan is talking about CT not VM? (althought I don't think such a setup makes sense) Tom