From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EBD81FF09F
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 03 Sep 2026 11:37:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 49CD12157F;
	Thu, 03 Sep 2026 11:37:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Daniel Herzig <d.herzig@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pve-network v2 0/4] make sure to use subnet config if
 available at point
In-Reply-To: <apaGBfWdWO04pjgH@luna.proxmox.com>
References: <20260831110116.300798-1-d.herzig@proxmox.com>
	<apaGBfWdWO04pjgH@luna.proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 11:37:11 +0200
Message-ID: <87y0difzg8.fsf@proxmox.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1788428229009
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     1.413 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: 7YHD4KHWJF3MJE642HG3ZQ735TGRQLUT
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7YHD4KHWJF3MJE642HG3ZQ735TGRQLUT
X-MailFrom: d.herzig@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com> writes:

> For the record, I=E2=80=99ve been working on a patch that reads the confi=
g only once,
> when starting an apply or dry-run, and then passes it through the entire =
SDN config application
> process.
>
> The patch adds around 300 lines though and touches a lot of critical code=
, so it will
> take some time to polish.
>
> In the meantime, IMO we can merge this targeted subnet fix.

This sound promising, we'd definitely benefit from some streamlining!=20