From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64CBE1FF16F for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:09:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9FD7D83B4; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:09:16 +0100 (CET) From: Daniel Herzig To: Mira Limbeck In-Reply-To: <080f00b4-2530-4369-9e9a-3d7e44c1cbed@proxmox.com> (Mira Limbeck's message of "Thu, 13 Feb 2025 12:29:33 +0100") References: <20250210120722.163622-1-d.herzig@proxmox.com> <20250210120722.163622-3-d.herzig@proxmox.com> <1126663e-7d43-4c6e-82e1-1fc7918fc67a@proxmox.com> <080f00b4-2530-4369-9e9a-3d7e44c1cbed@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:09:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87tt8xdgq1.fsf@proxmox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.386 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH 2/8 container] cloudinit: basic implementation X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Mira Limbeck writes: > On 2/13/25 12:01, Fiona Ebner wrote: >> Am 10.02.25 um 13:07 schrieb Daniel Herzig: >>> From: Leo Nunner >>> >> >> @Mira do you know more by chance? > I don't think vendor-data should be part of the instance-id. It's used > to create a first configuration that a user can override via the user > config. > The vendor-data won't be used again once it's already configured. > I'm not a 100% sure, but changing the instance-id leads to rerunning > lots of modules (e.g. User, Network and others), but the vendor-data > parts do not. > > Only a complete `cloud-init clean` should trigger the modules using > vendor-data to run again. > > > https://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/explanation/vendordata.html#vendor-data > Thanks for the input Mira! _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel