From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <lindsay.mathieson@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7282B609F5 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 01:53:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 64486168F4 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 01:53:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 51ABC168E4 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 01:53:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id w202so2975285pff.10 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:53:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=Ojk0WawJq5vDGYJ/+G3sqLYVqnTcnIRaBbqTl70IGNw=; b=DhfUsR/BIj+F6PfaZtp9tSPSpsaFKitTaBfSB4TA8bN/8DNwEcVVno1zEDWhzkMkxG Pg42pkZNsyQy/Yrfwlb2sSvbQYQJnDhrybEmh+rK4Ii0mqenAzxdaDpo/8fncSDOxnIQ B+CjplNdMtOKTlEYsauA2AoLpILsZe1Gm3aMladaoEc3+Rgx0tg0D3Xf54eCe/4pYQVW q+XrHH6wUZmQDlWyUg74s3O6s87j9HLWc828taPVUw3ol+TLKGeDFChMsiwCS/wNme/h VmYsrMBj+KN2kPuyoJxqsZyCEwAWs2murfkbV5vVOH80g7Dy6Mu3u7qfRPT2v9Tezp9r tCYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=Ojk0WawJq5vDGYJ/+G3sqLYVqnTcnIRaBbqTl70IGNw=; b=Ka8SrVjzXOY2aCMOURP6Ff0Ne5kov09p91OYaXTaV3danho+pJaexikWAM+6phoSwY a+lDX0ym7+RgT7WN6NKNK4uYlKQH30lOe7E6mamllkOYNxuB/lZh2equOLb8REJkq+Hv FBOhjQ0Somov2YnFE+lDffUf7/GgtZgZrUUSFWxNegIFrr/hRiyfFYsC1UZX0njGEQi3 hWSYYZIESqNDDeYQqrX1purGm+hfDMiikw9sCr8D4Xh69xalOn0NhtIDijH1mqyTqR81 VS/LWSgDV5XXmgDG0SbScyZea82Yw23HrpLi1ZVIgWa6MuEwK3Lo+QDpRViY6OTjZjwB JmUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gowtBWKlRqGz0XS5AdidQCv87RacNL86T9eHgz+vQLXncwKIn onanohve0Qv5rk/kgiWdWm4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpFcGGzEP5736Day/x0WtI1vdaYag4jv6oSrRcPvy0pwTPprvBaShFX5nKmjtvgANX0Uf4OQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:7b85:0:b029:198:11e5:596 with SMTP id w127-20020a627b850000b029019811e50596mr4763697pfc.40.1606438414662; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:53:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m7sm5957404pfh.72.2020.11.26.16.53.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:53:33 -0800 (PST) To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> References: <4545c7f5-9b50-2f0a-952a-cc532ad01b13@gmail.com> <32d89f84-29a7-90c4-deed-1a3638c99098@proxmox.com> From: Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87cdd210-4605-9427-c863-aed6e6e5ca38@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:53:28 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <32d89f84-29a7-90c4-deed-1a3638c99098@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.034 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] [update available] Re: Caution: ceph-mon service does not start after today's updates X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:53:43 -0000 On 27/11/2020 5:35 am, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Hi Uwe and Lindsay, > > ceph 14.2.15-pve2 is now available, it includes fixes for the ordering > restraints of the various ceph service unit files[0], besides that there > where zero actual code changes. > > Due to that and Stoiko's tests (much thanks for all the help!) confirming > the positive result of mine, we uploaded it for general availability. > > Thanks also to you two for reporting! Thanks for the really quick turnaround Thomas, and sorry for not getting back to you before, but it was 3am my time and once I got the servers back up, I really needed to crash :) Will test tonight, cheers. -- Lindsay