From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <s.lendl@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C26D9058C
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:15:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E7D27468B
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:14:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:14:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0969B4497D;
Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:14:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Stefan Lendl <s.lendl@proxmox.com>
To: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>, Proxmox Backup Server development
discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <CZRSMABGTBRA.PLTG35RS57W4@proxmox.com>
References: <20240308133625.32282-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
<87a5n32143.fsf@gmail.com> <CZRSMABGTBRA.PLTG35RS57W4@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:14:39 +0200
Message-ID: <877chgkodc.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.025 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3] api: make prune-group a
real workertask
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>,
<mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>,
<mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 11:15:11 -0000
"Gabriel Goller" <g.goller@proxmox.com> writes:
> On Tue Mar 12, 2024 at 11:30 AM CET, Stefan Lendl wrote:
>>
>> LGTM with a slight note below for a style preference.
>>
>> > + let prune_group = move |worker: Arc<WorkerTask>| {
>> > + if keep_all {
>> > + task_log!(worker, "No prune selection - keeping all files.");
>> > + } else {
>>
>> You don't actually need to spawn a task if you're not doing any work.
>> On the other hand it makes the code slightly simpler and you need the
>> worker, right?
>
> IMO starting a worker is better, because the user sees that something is
> happening... I mean we could also immediately return and show a popup in
> the frontend, but that won't work when the user isn't logged
> in/currently looking at the page. This way he simply sees a prune job in
> the task log which prints 'No prune selection - keeping all files'.
>
Makes sense!