From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C5360189 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:18:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AC0C98F58 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:18:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 11DDC8F2F for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:18:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CBCDE41BA1; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:18:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>, "Bertorello, Marco" <me@marcobertorello.it>, chris@itg.uy Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> References: <0eca6cfc-96c5-ab78-1dea-0e2dc2f043b7@marcobertorello.it> <989e0a2e-50f1-8e15-0378-b6b488dd45f8@proxmox.com> Message-ID: <8510ceb5-cacc-fd02-eca4-430d480bbaf4@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:18:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:81.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/81.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <989e0a2e-50f1-8e15-0378-b6b488dd45f8@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.178 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] New Mobile App X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:18:38 -0000 FYI: the next release (1.0.1) is out and should be available as update. The 443 port works now too, all other ports should naturally continue to = work. cheers, Thomas