From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4715393320
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:46:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 31A3331E2D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:46:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:46:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DCF2843778
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:46:56 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <848a06d3-a136-482b-9fa4-07971c956a55@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:46:56 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
References: <20231219094023.25726-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
 <20231219094023.25726-2-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231219094023.25726-2-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.071 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH common 1/1] tools: Add is_native sub to
 compare the CPU architecture
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:46:58 -0000

Am 19.12.23 um 10:40 schrieb Filip Schauer:
> Add an is_native($arch) subroutine to compare a CPU architecture to the
> host CPU architecture. This is brought in from PVE::QemuServer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/PVE/Tools.pm | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/src/PVE/Tools.pm b/src/PVE/Tools.pm
> index 766c809..7bb1809 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/Tools.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/Tools.pm
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ extract_param
>  extract_sensitive_params
>  file_copy
>  get_host_arch
> +is_native
>  O_PATH
>  O_TMPFILE
>  AT_EMPTY_PATH
> @@ -1841,6 +1842,11 @@ sub get_host_arch {
>      return $host_arch;
>  }
>  
> +sub is_native($) {

This is a too generic name to put in such a generic module like Tools.
Admittedly, it's also a too generic name in QemuServer IMHO ;) Maybe
arch_is_native() or is_native_arch()?

I'm not fully convinced the move is worth it, but it does belong to
get_host_arch() semantically, so fine by me.

> +    my ($arch) = @_;
> +    return get_host_arch() eq $arch;
> +}
> +
>  # Devices are: [ (12 bits minor) (12 bits major) (8 bits minor) ]
>  sub dev_t_major($) {
>      my ($dev_t) = @_;