From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BEE29C5C1 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:52:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 696311F087 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:51:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:51:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9F02E44C2C; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:51:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <8185c74e-d3a3-4c6b-bdfa-e4446b9aa949@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:51:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20231019133607.1416999-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <20231019133607.1416999-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <1e3aaf6e-efcf-4033-a017-ed2ee8bb8e0d@proxmox.com> <562e6c04-18b1-4ef7-ae74-c14cfd4f1f9b@proxmox.com> <5db9a4ea-fa58-4ecc-afff-f808a29b3b87@proxmox.com> From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: <5db9a4ea-fa58-4ecc-afff-f808a29b3b87@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.012 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [mozilla.org] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 2/3] ui: tags: prevent pasting non plain-text content X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:52:12 -0000 On 10/24/23 12:07, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 24/10/2023 um 11:57 schrieb Dominik Csapak: >> On 10/24/23 11:53, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: >>> Am 19/10/2023 um 15:59 schrieb Dominik Csapak: >>>> sry disregard this patch only, that property value is not supported in firefox :( >>>> >>> >>> We could set it only to "plaintext-only" for non-firefox then though? >> >> sure not a problem, i just generally try to avoid browser specific stuff >> >> if there is a way to prevent pasting html in a sane way for all browsers >> i'd prefer that, but did not have the time to look into that.. >> > > OK, let's make "no special cases for browsers" a rule that should have as > few as possible exceptions, that can only benefit users and devs reproducing > issues. that makes sense, i'll add a section to the javascript style guide, is that fine with you? > > I subscribed to the enhancement request [0] at Mozilla's Bugzilla, where > they state that it's only blocked on the spec being to vague and lacking test > cases, so once it's done and released in an ESR we can switch to this > unconditionally > > [0]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1291467#c22 i'll subscribe too, thanks for researching that