From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AE1D9C337 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 23:18:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6FAAB18BA6 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 23:17:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 23:17:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c5087d19a6so56428181fa.0 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:17:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698095845; x=1698700645; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:content-language:reply-to:to :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=D9w9K4fJ0SI+laiwOdJFqozXbid7LlEy3ZEWwYnZcy4=; b=kF8MPLcPgnxhoSSfpYzu58PPLJyHS5/sTGqBRx71jxoUSNslFrz2W8htKxRw9G5MmI bvhLvzZ3hSAoJnLZBpsnykNP2QR4QeBhSu6zIqk51reoQL5JAn4or5vF9gQoCOeylGyW 7mSTXKSpaO2bw+tL/hCak+XyEBNyWAQcRQv6G1ZYM8IYxjz6xMDR5KlxZKHF+3W3Adm0 9Gj6cO/hi6T6zLnxn3suAy0Ss8O8msDxLKeUo7M7Vr7raKuQSJq2Kh6tCl/YzPp6RgAZ YSgcY9uOTrshaaGUul5SJxhHzGVmgjGKgUOQDUh7CvtQASm+jaO57C7FezgIHoYbd5AA W2aQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698095845; x=1698700645; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:content-language:reply-to:to :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=D9w9K4fJ0SI+laiwOdJFqozXbid7LlEy3ZEWwYnZcy4=; b=YY5MRd6AYGwMCt5TeFp63+CoaOwfJU8uz5F5z+TaQ4CjI0RkWq1dCUFOLSTRIeDbNy hLWSjOfrtq2zOa0whGXPDh/zWCb+9UVKfyQjOZYTKEJBW01fd6859NOSo/FQprA4HsYk mIHFURNoD2SFG8IIzptw1G0msIWHNFsWHHoKCZ3pA0rpvRai533rwGn9RJ/ccKb3eo1E wDoP0qgUtmKh6sjthVqcXbUnIRZATnSTpRF2nRFRsol0EGHjt+3dYFTQfeDC2qgpoaPy SamVaqaDmFMUCPEFDlh0AYPCAE8fbNzr0ER0lIdobe/tPtobnpEmHshtm7FaDS+5RV6R cIMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwWRFUh+Vzo+GMb7CqCoEeDTok2NTXPcMxCZ7/6a/9AgLXwC7ZF NP1PCZvjthvTisgjHMK0vFc08P+UyHE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHd9JdBlrXTGiiaIHO6FQoa8PtZCkedv+4cDjrG6VZ43rTcR6wVnKn2N4W+RFsithuB4vCxrg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:306:b0:2c4:feef:64ee with SMTP id a6-20020a05651c030600b002c4feef64eemr6203703ljp.50.1698095844579; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.49.44] (ip-109-192-041-223.um38.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [109.192.41.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m16-20020a7bca50000000b00405d9a950a2sm14842797wml.28.2023.10.23.14.17.23 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7fb6b78c-8a6d-496f-ac3e-89910c34b6d3@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 23:17:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com Content-Language: de-DE, en-US From: Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [PVE-User] Question regarding resource pools and assigning not yet used IDs X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 21:18:04 -0000 Hi all, reading the documentation about user management [1] and especially about resource pools I keep wondering if there is a way to pre-assign IDs to resource pools so that a group with the necessary permissions can create new VMs within the pre-assigned ID range. E.g. I have two groups, let's call them A and B. In order to keep order in the Proxmox cluster, I'd like to give each group a certain ID range within they can manage (and create) their one VMs, say A -> IDs 300-349 B -> IDs 350-379 As far as I understand the documentation (and please correct me if I'm wrong) there is no way to do this. What I understand is that once a VM is created and has an ID assigned some admin with higher privileges needs to assign said VM to a resource pool so that it than can be managed by the respective group. If this is correct the concept of resource pools seems to be lacking an important feature to lower the administrative burden. The WebUI also shows no way to define such a range. When I browse to datacenter -> resource pool -> mypool and try to add a VM I can only select existing ones. (What I also noticed is that you cannot add containers to a pool… though I don't know if that would make sense.) Thanks, Uwe [1] https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-pveum.html