From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <s.reiter@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57BE660A8C for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:18:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 47F9D1741F for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:18:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6094B17415 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:18:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1FACA449DA; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:18:01 +0200 (CEST) To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Graeme Seaton <lists@graemes.com> References: <aedfb2d1-22ce-b653-59f5-42783e8da20f@graemes.com> <c14e472e-b64f-294c-e784-8c86582a419c@proxmox.com> <beff72e2-1e71-8e92-fedf-2006458b75ac@graemes.com> From: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com> Message-ID: <7e4e9d26-dfbf-2563-a33b-9919d414619e@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:18:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <beff72e2-1e71-8e92-fedf-2006458b75ac@graemes.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.539 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -0.324 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Template backup failure in 0.8-13 X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 09:18:02 -0000 On 9/2/20 11:41 PM, Graeme Seaton wrote: > Thanks Stefan. Every developers favourite question :-) - any indication > of when this might be released to the test (non-enterprise) repo? Every users favourite answer: As soon as it's ready ;) (but probably not too long) We're already testing the 5.1 build internally, but as it entails a new upstream version this takes a bit longer than usual. ~ Stefan > > Regards, > > Graeme > > On 02/09/2020 08:54, Stefan Reiter wrote: >> On 9/2/20 9:07 AM, Graeme Seaton wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Receiving the following error message with 0.8-13: >>> >>> INFO: Starting Backup of VM 10019 (qemu) >>> INFO: Backup started at 2020-09-02 00:47:01 >>> INFO: status = stopped >>> INFO: backup mode: stop >>> INFO: ionice priority: 7 >>> INFO: VM Name: ubnt1604tmpl >>> INFO: include disk 'scsi0' 'tank0:base-10019-disk-0' 2252M >>> INFO: creating Proxmox Backup Server archive >>> 'vm/10019/2020-09-01T23:47:01Z' >>> INFO: starting kvm to execute backup task >>> generating cloud-init ISO >>> ERROR: VM 10019 qmp command 'backup' failed - Node 'drive-scsi0' >>> is read only >>> INFO: stopping kvm after backup task >>> trying to acquire lock... >>> OK >>> ERROR: Backup of VM 10019 failed - VM 10019 qmp command 'backup' >>> failed - Node 'drive-scsi0' is read only >>> INFO: Failed at 2020-09-02 00:47:02 >>> >> >> Hi! >> >> The fix for this is already in our git[0] and will be available in an >> upcoming pve-qemu-kvm package (presumable QEMU 5.1 based). >> >> ~ Stefan >> >> [0] >> https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-qemu.git;a=commit;h=a5feeebc519cdbe7225652e1d2faefa90e39cca3 >> >> >>> All clients and server are on latest versions. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Graeme >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> pbs-devel mailing list >>> pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com >>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > pbs-devel mailing list > pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel